Jim Fulton wrote:
Only you and Philipp were excited about this. Not sure that
constitutes a ringing endorsement. Maybe others will chime in now.
I'm +10 too.
I'd like to see this happen before the end of the year.
Well, given that the majority are +/-0 and with the exception of one or
tw
On 18 Feb 2006, at 13:08, Stephan Richter wrote:
On Friday 17 February 2006 23:54, Jim Fulton wrote:
Only you and Philipp were excited about this. Not sure that
constitutes a ringing endorsement. Maybe others will chime in now.
I'm +10 too.
I'd like to see this happen before the end of th
On Friday 17 February 2006 23:54, Jim Fulton wrote:
> > Only you and Philipp were excited about this. Not sure that
> > constitutes a ringing endorsement. Maybe others will chime in now.
>
> I'm +10 too.
>
> I'd like to see this happen before the end of the year.
-1. I only change my vote, if
Gary Poster wrote:
On Feb 17, 2006, at 6:26 PM, Chris Withers wrote:
Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
We'd have to declare the zope3-dev list for obsolete and make people
not
send messages to it. We'd just have to define a date and time. All
subsequent mail traffic would be handled by zope
if we're voting, I'm +0.
--
Paul Winkler
http://www.slinkp.com
___
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
(Related lists -
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/
Gary Poster wrote:
On Feb 17, 2006, at 6:26 PM, Chris Withers wrote:
Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
We'd have to declare the zope3-dev list for obsolete and make people
not
send messages to it. We'd just have to define a date and time. All
subsequent mail traffic would be handled by zope
On Feb 17, 2006, at 6:26 PM, Chris Withers wrote:
Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
We'd have to declare the zope3-dev list for obsolete and make
people not
send messages to it. We'd just have to define a date and time. All
subsequent mail traffic would be handled by zope-dev.
Okay, who act
