[Zope-dev] Re: request.debug needed for Zope 3 ZPT engine

2006-04-30 Thread Philipp von Weitershausen
Florent Guillaume wrote: > We can't potentially break currently perfectly working applications. > I'd propose either: > > - introduce a config flag somewhere (zope.conf), off by default, > switching the zope 2 REQUEST.debug to not using form/cookies/others but > the proper attribute that zope 3 exp

[Zope-dev] Re: request.debug needed for Zope 3 ZPT engine

2006-04-29 Thread Florent Guillaume
Philipp von Weitershausen wrote: Several components that we'd like to use in Zope2, such as the SequenceEngine from Zope3, use the Zope 3 ZPT engine to render some things. (This has nothing to do with Zope 2 using or not using the Zope 3 ZPT engine.) The Zope 3 ZPT engine, in particular zope.app

Re: [Zope-dev] Re: request.debug needed for Zope 3 ZPT engine

2006-04-28 Thread Philipp von Weitershausen
Chris Withers wrote: > Philipp von Weitershausen wrote: >> Philipp von Weitershausen wrote: >>> Several components that we'd like to use in Zope2, such as the >>> SequenceEngine from Zope3, >> >> That's meant to say SequenceWidget, and we already *are* using it in >> Five, so not supporting request

Re: [Zope-dev] Re: request.debug needed for Zope 3 ZPT engine

2006-04-28 Thread Chris Withers
Philipp von Weitershausen wrote: Philipp von Weitershausen wrote: Several components that we'd like to use in Zope2, such as the SequenceEngine from Zope3, That's meant to say SequenceWidget, and we already *are* using it in Five, so not supporting request.debug would mean dropping support for

[Zope-dev] Re: request.debug needed for Zope 3 ZPT engine

2006-04-27 Thread Philipp von Weitershausen
Philipp von Weitershausen wrote: > Several components that we'd like to use in Zope2, such as the > SequenceEngine from Zope3, That's meant to say SequenceWidget, and we already *are* using it in Five, so not supporting request.debug would mean dropping support for SequenceWidget or having to reim