Christian Theune wrote:
> On 03/29/2010 04:08 PM, Christian Theune wrote:
>> Hi everyone,
>>
>> on the way towards a ZTK 1.0 release we first looked for a single
>> volunteer release manager who would drive the process.
>>
>> As no one stepped up and no (serious) nominations were presented the
>
On 03/29/2010 04:08 PM, Christian Theune wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> on the way towards a ZTK 1.0 release we first looked for a single
> volunteer release manager who would drive the process.
>
> As no one stepped up and no (serious) nominations were presented the
> discussion went back to the drawin
Hi.
On Sat, Apr 3, 2010 at 8:44 PM, Christophe Combelles wrote:
> I will be the representative for BlueBream, since Baiju is already doing an
> enormous amount of work and he needs help.
Awesome news!
> Let's wait a little bit more for a caveman to stand up for Grok, and we can
> start discussi
Christian Theune a écrit :
> Hi everyone,
>
> on the way towards a ZTK 1.0 release we first looked for a single
> volunteer release manager who would drive the process.
>
> As no one stepped up and no (serious) nominations were presented the
> discussion went back to the drawing board and the p
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 14:47, Hanno Schlichting wrote:
> Since I just stepped up as the Zope2 release manager, I'd be happy to
> be involved and help out with this. Pending any objections against me
> as a release manager that is :)
Great!
> I'm probably not going to be able to drive the ZTK pr
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 4:08 PM, Christian Theune wrote:
> * Zope 2: In theory I'd suggest the Zope 2 release manager. In practice
> I'd like to nominate Hanno because he's been very active with Zope 2
> recently and already has done work on the ZTK before. (Hanno: sorry.
> *duck*)
Since I
Hi everyone,
on the way towards a ZTK 1.0 release we first looked for a single
volunteer release manager who would drive the process.
As no one stepped up and no (serious) nominations were presented the
discussion went back to the drawing board and the plan was changed a
bit: we'd like to go w
