Martin Aspeli wrote:
Martijn Faassen wrote:
Instead, we had endless debates about whether it was a legitimate
concern for the ZTK maintainers. I'm of course still right that it is.
I have wonderful and coherent reasons to support my position just like
everybody else does who disagrees with
Martijn Faassen wrote:
[snip]
So how can we have better discussions?
We can have better discussions by helping me.
How can you help me? Of course it helps if you agree with me. I realize
that's frequently infeasible, but I certainly wouldn't mind. :)
If you disagree with me, I'd like
Hi there,
A meta-discussion, how dangerous! Let's see whether it can help us
improve the way we work together, though.
I'll talk about how I think, from my perspective, we can improve the
quality of discourse on this mailing list and be more constructive.
What lowered the quality of this
Martijn Faassen wrote:
What lowered the quality of this discussion? I think it is because
various people became quite upset and annoyed. That's because I reverted
Hanno's changes to the ZTK trunk. I shouldn't have done that just like
that, but I needed the subsequent discussion to come up
