> > It would be great if you could do it, but beware that you will be
> > benchmarking a lot of overhead if you only plan to measure storage
> > performance. Why not use ZODB directly ?
>
> If I talk HTTP, it measures things fully - Python's interpreter lock
> will mean a storage system written i
On Fri, 9 Jun 2000, Petru Paler wrote:
> > I'd love some sort of benchmarking tool for this (and posibly other
> > Storages). I guess the best way would a python script that uses urllib.
> > Something that would algorithmically pump up the DB to > 1GB in size
> > and retrieve the URL's. Any volu
> I'd love some sort of benchmarking tool for this (and posibly other
> Storages). I guess the best way would a python script that uses urllib.
> Something that would algorithmically pump up the DB to > 1GB in size
> and retrieve the URL's. Any volunteers or am I doing it in my
> copious spare ti
On Wed, 7 Jun 2000, Petru Paler wrote:
> Comments ? Suggestions ?
>
> PS: a new DirectoryStorage release will be done today, with bugfixes and
> new features.
I'd love some sort of benchmarking tool for this (and posibly other
Storages). I guess the best way would a python script that uses url
Jimmie Houchin wrote:
>
> From my naive understanding, would this help with the problem ZODB has
> with regard to folders with many objects? Would a person who is using
> DirectoryStorage not necessarily be required to partition their objects
> into an artificially derived hierarchical directory
Petru Paler writes:
> > >Glad you find it interesting :)
> >
> > Very. I think the line between FileSYstem and Database gets more blurred
> > every day.
>
> That's what Hans Reiser says all the time :)
>
> > Thanks for the heads up. I have to patch my kernel up to 2.2.11 first,
> > then
> I don't have the two on comparable machines :-(
>
> Do you have a standard benchmark for comparing the relative performance
> FileStorage/DirectoryStorage on reiser fs?
Not yet. I have been using a script which just creates/retrieves
objects from the ODB but I guess something more serious
I don't have the two on comparable machines :-(
Do you have a standard benchmark for comparing the relative performance
FileStorage/DirectoryStorage on reiser fs?
> > M. I suspect NTs heavier file security checks will prove to be a
> > significant disadvantage - benchmarks to follow.
>
>
> M. I suspect NTs heavier file security checks will prove to be a
> significant disadvantage - benchmarks to follow.
If you do benchmarks, you should do them comparing
DirectoryStorage/NTFS to DirectoryStorage/reiserfs, because (at least at
mass object creation) DirectoryStorage is slower
> The version I sent to the list assumes a '/' directory
> separator. I'm
> releasing a fixed version (a snapshot of my working code) in
> a couple of
> seconds.
Thats fine on windows too (a backslash is only required on the standard
command line, but everywhere else a / is ok too)
> I
> > Hello all,
> >
> > You probably saw my yesterday post with the first alpha of
> >ReiserStorage.
>
> Woohoo!
>
> Id like to try this on NT with NTFS too (which has similar performance
> characteristics with big directories and small files). Do you think
> this is worth a try, or do
> From my naive understanding, would this help with the problem ZODB has
> with regard to folders with many objects? Would a person who is using
> DirectoryStorage not necessarily be required to partition their objects
> into an artificially derived hierarchical directory structure?
No, these
On Wed, 7 Jun 2000 18:00:31 +0300 (EEST), Petru Paler
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> You probably saw my yesterday post with the first alpha of
>ReiserStorage.
Woohoo!
Id like to try this on NT with NTFS too (which has similar performance
characteristics with big directo
>From my naive understanding, would this help with the problem ZODB has
with regard to folders with many objects? Would a person who is using
DirectoryStorage not necessarily be required to partition their objects
into an artificially derived hierarchical directory structure?
In other words can i
> >Glad you find it interesting :)
>
> Very. I think the line between FileSYstem and Database gets more blurred
> every day.
That's what Hans Reiser says all the time :)
> Thanks for the heads up. I have to patch my kernel up to 2.2.11 first,
> then I'll be recompiling, then creating. I
Petru Paler writes:
> > This is the embodiment of my MutliFileStorage thingy on Jim's ZODB Wiki. I
>
>Oops, didn't saw the ZODB Wiki until now :)
>
> > droped it (Never picked it up) when Mountable Storage was announced. I'll
> > create a ReierFS partition some time this week and try it o
> This is the embodiment of my MutliFileStorage thingy on Jim's ZODB Wiki. I
Oops, didn't saw the ZODB Wiki until now :)
> droped it (Never picked it up) when Mountable Storage was announced. I'll
> create a ReierFS partition some time this week and try it out. Excellent!
Glad you find
Petru Paler:
This is the embodiment of my MutliFileStorage thingy on Jim's ZODB Wiki. I
droped it (Never picked it up) when Mountable Storage was announced. I'll
create a ReierFS partition some time this week and try it out. Excellent!
> Hello all,
>
>You probably saw my yester
18 matches
Mail list logo
