Re: [Zope-dev] xmlrpc: Syntax error at line 34: illegal character in content

2001-05-10 Thread Chris Withers
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > RuntimeError: Syntax error at line 34: illegal character in content This was the bane of one of our projects to the point where Andy re-wrote ZMailIn to no-longer use XML-RPC. It's to do with stuff-which-should-probably-be-entities but we never tracked down what was

SV: Subject: [Zope-dev] change ownership

2001-05-10 Thread Magnus Heino (Rivermen)
I can get it to work :-/ I get an attributeerror on aq_inner in lib/python/AccessControl/Owned.py, line 302, in ownerInfo Seems as if the user i provide isn't of the right type? How do you use your method? How is it being called? /Magnus > Magnus, > No, changeOwnership is not exposed for TTW

RE: Subject: [Zope-dev] change ownership

2001-05-10 Thread Tim McLaughlin
I call the external method like this from DTML... set_owner(restrictedTraverse(path_to_user)), where path to user is a physical path, but I'm using the ZUserFolder, so I can use the restrictedTraverse to get to users. UserFolder has a different API. You could do this if your acl_users is a sta

SV: Subject: [Zope-dev] change ownership

2001-05-10 Thread Magnus Heino (Rivermen)
> def set_owner(self, user_name): > self.changeOwnership(self.acl_users.getUser(user_name)) > > OK, so that should keep you busy for a while. Anyway, the Not long enough :-P > point is that the > parameter to changeOwnership is a User _object_. Good luck. Ive got this external method in

SV: Subject: [Zope-dev] change ownership

2001-05-10 Thread Magnus Heino (Rivermen)
The one that comes with Zope. /Magnus > -Ursprungligt meddelande- > Från: Tim McLaughlin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Skickat: den 10 maj 2001 15:26 > Till: 'Magnus Heino (Rivermen)'; Tim McLaughlin > Kopia: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' > Ämne: RE: Subject: [Zope-dev] change ownership > > > Wh

RE: Subject: [Zope-dev] change ownership

2001-05-10 Thread Tim McLaughlin
What kind of UserFolder are you using... LoginManager or something? -Original Message- From: Magnus Heino (Rivermen) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2001 9:13 AM To: 'Tim McLaughlin'; Magnus Heino (Rivermen) Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: SV: Subject: [Zope-dev] chang

RE: Subject: [Zope-dev] change ownership

2001-05-10 Thread Tim McLaughlin
Do you have multiple acl_users objects in the acquisition context of the object? Because if you do and the self.acl_users will acquire (possibly) the wrong user database. If that's not the problem, I'm gonna have to let it cook, and I'll probably come up w/ somethin' later. --Tim You could al

Re: [Zope-dev] Object dereferancing Question

2001-05-10 Thread Casey Duncan
"R. David Murray" wrote: > > On Tue, 8 May 2001, Jeff wrote: > > I have created a product with a zclass that contains a zclass; classA contains >classB. > [...] > > Now for the part I don't understand. > > I have a page where I would like dynamically display a classB object. I used the >fol

Re: [Zope-dev] Question about import code

2001-05-10 Thread Shane Hathaway
Fred Wilson Horch wrote: > The problem that happens on import is a KeyError on line 194 of this bit > of code: > > lines 192-197 of lib/python/ZODB/ExportImport.py > > ooid=h[:8] > if oids: > oid=oids[ooid] > if type(oid) is

[Zope-dev] Experiments with ORMapping

2001-05-10 Thread Shane Hathaway
Kapil (and others), Although very sketchy and I can't guarantee anything works, my experiments with object-relational mapping in Zope are found at http://www.zope.org/Members/hathawsh/ormapping.tar.gz . If ORMapping.py is in the ZODB directory, you can use the following custom_zodb.py to run Zop

Re: [Zope-dev] Experiments with ORMapping

2001-05-10 Thread Tino Wildenhain
Hi Shane, --On Donnerstag, 10. Mai 2001 11:32 -0400 Shane Hathaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: ... > But storage of binary pickles was never the intention anyway. I created > a little interface that would allow you to store different classes in > different PostgreSQL tables. Before I got to im

Re: [Zope-dev] Experiments with ORMapping

2001-05-10 Thread Shane Hathaway
Tino Wildenhain wrote: > > But storage of binary pickles was never the intention anyway. I created > > a little interface that would allow you to store different classes in > > different PostgreSQL tables. Before I got to implementing anything, > > Is this much like the ZPatterns approach? Whi

Re: [Zope-dev] Question about import code

2001-05-10 Thread Fred Wilson Horch
Hi Shane, You wrote: > > Importing multiple objects simultaneously could result in a fair amount > of confusion... Can you elaborate? When you import a folder, for example, it imports the folder and all objects in it. Why is it any different to import two unrelated objects? Would it be bette

[Zope-dev] PropertyManagerEvents proposal: Last call for review

2001-05-10 Thread Casey Duncan
I have a proposal up for discussion on adding hookable callbacks to property events. If you are interested in such topics as property validation, CatalogAware syncing on property changes, etc, please take a look within the next few days. I think this is something that many people could use, so you

oodb philosophics ;) was: Re: [Zope-dev] Experiments with ORMapping

2001-05-10 Thread Tino Wildenhain
Hi shane, I think the motivation people want an RDBMS storage beneth zodb is because they understand RDBMSes these days are performant, relieable and can quiete easy maintained. I've seen Java implementations using this approach to achive persistens using as example "Powertier[tm]" to explicit m

Re: [Zope-dev] Question about import code

2001-05-10 Thread Shane Hathaway
Fred Wilson Horch wrote: > You wrote: > > > > Importing multiple objects simultaneously could result in a fair amount > > of confusion... > > Can you elaborate? When you import a folder, for example, it imports > the folder and all objects in it. If there are some objects in the folder that hav

Re: oodb philosophics ;) was: Re: [Zope-dev] Experiments with ORMapping

2001-05-10 Thread Shane Hathaway
Tino Wildenhain wrote: > I think the motivation people want an RDBMS storage beneth zodb is > because they understand RDBMSes these days are performant, relieable > and can quiete easy maintained. The other motivations for an RDBMS are (1) people have existing schemas and want Zope to access the

Re: oodb philosophics ;) was: Re: [Zope-dev] Experiments with ORMapping

2001-05-10 Thread Casey Duncan
Tino Wildenhain wrote: > > Hi shane, > > I think the motivation people want an RDBMS storage beneth zodb is > because they understand RDBMSes these days are performant, relieable > and can quiete easy maintained. > > I've seen Java implementations using this approach to achive persistens > usin

Re: [Zope-dev] Experiments with ORMapping

2001-05-10 Thread Joachim Werner
> You know, it might be possible to get a team together to implement > this. How many out there would be interested in pursuing it further? > IMHO it's not as much work as it sounds at first. Zope being so > object-oriented, you really can replace one of its most fundamental > assumptions (an OO

Re: oodb philosophics ;) was: Re: [Zope-dev] Experiments withORMapping

2001-05-10 Thread Tino Wildenhain
Hi Casey, > How about XML storage! 8^) You think startup times are slow now... argh ;) Buzzword-detected ;)) XML would be only a different pickling format :) Regards Tino ___ Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.zope.org/mailman/list

Re: [Zope-dev] Experiments with ORMapping

2001-05-10 Thread Shane Hathaway
Joachim Werner wrote: > > > You know, it might be possible to get a team together to implement > > this. How many out there would be interested in pursuing it further? > > IMHO it's not as much work as it sounds at first. Zope being so > > object-oriented, you really can replace one of its most

Re: [Zope-dev] ZEO Clients, broken servers, and Z2.pid

2001-05-10 Thread Michel Pelletier
On Thu, 10 May 2001, Anthony Baxter wrote: > As far as I can see, ZEO clients don't write a pid to Z2.pid until > after they've successfully connected to a storage. Is there a reason > for this? Probably not. It's nothing to do with ZEO, z2.py does an 'import Zope' before it writes the z2.pid f

Re: [Zope-dev] xmlrpc "500 Internal Server Error"

2001-05-10 Thread Dieter Maurer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > ... > File "/usr/lib/python1.5/xmllib.py", line 227, in goahead > self.syntax_error('illegal character in content') > File "/usr/lib/python1.5/xmllib.py", line 748, in syntax_error > raise RuntimeError, 'Syntax error at line %d: %s' % (self.lineno, > m

Re: [Zope-dev] xmlrpc "500 Internal Server Error"

2001-05-10 Thread richard
Dieter Maurer wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > ... > > File "/usr/lib/python1.5/xmllib.py", line 227, in goahead > > self.syntax_error('illegal character in content') > > File "/usr/lib/python1.5/xmllib.py", line 748, in syntax_error > > raise RuntimeError, 'Syntax error at

Re: [Zope-dev] xmlrpc: Syntax error at line 34: illegal character in content

2001-05-10 Thread richard
Chris Withers wrote: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > RuntimeError: Syntax error at line 34: illegal character in content > > This was the bane of one of our projects to the point where Andy re-wrote > ZMailIn to no-longer use XML-RPC. Yeah, I am currently base64'ing the data, and it works.

Re: [Zope-dev] xmlrpc: Syntax error at line 34: illegal character in content

2001-05-10 Thread Andy McKay
> Yeah, I am currently base64'ing the data, and it works. Ive seen this in some code but didnt want to say anything for fear of sounding stupid. It doesnt seem right somehow. -- Andy McKay. ___ Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists

Re: [Zope-dev] xmlrpc: Syntax error at line 34: illegal character in content

2001-05-10 Thread richard
Andy McKay wrote: > > > Yeah, I am currently base64'ing the data, and it works. > > Ive seen this in some code but didnt want to say anything for fear of > sounding stupid. It doesnt seem right somehow. See, this is the problem. I'm running into crunch-time at the moment, and I really don't hav

Re: [Zope-dev] xmlrpc: Syntax error at line 34: illegal character in content

2001-05-10 Thread Shane Hathaway
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Andy McKay wrote: > > > > > Yeah, I am currently base64'ing the data, and it works. > > > > Ive seen this in some code but didnt want to say anything for fear of > > sounding stupid. It doesnt seem right somehow. > > See, this is the problem. I'm running into crunch-

Re: [Zope-dev] xmlrpc: Syntax error at line 34: illegal character in content

2001-05-10 Thread richard
Shane Hathaway wrote: > The problem with sending binary data unencoded is line endings: \r\n > might be "helpfully" converted to \n and vice-versa. Other characters > can be encoded but apparently parsers treat and as a > real line ending. I'm not sure where this leaves me... I think this m

[Zope-dev] OS X support

2001-05-10 Thread Terry Kerr
Hi, Is there any plans for zope to support OS X? terry -- Terry Kerr ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Adroit Internet Solutions (www.adroit.net) Phone: +61 3 9563 4461 Fax: +61 3 9563 3856 ICQ: 79303381 ___ Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.

Re: [Zope-dev] OS X support

2001-05-10 Thread marc lindahl
There's a howto on that, I recall seeing. > Hi, > > Is there any plans for zope to support OS X? > ___ Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists -

Re: [Zope-dev] xmlrpc: Syntax error at line 34: illegal characterin content

2001-05-10 Thread Shane Hathaway
On Fri, 11 May 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Shane Hathaway wrote: > > The problem with sending binary data unencoded is line endings: \r\n > > might be "helpfully" converted to \n and vice-versa. Other characters > > can be encoded but apparently parsers treat and as a > > real line endi

Re: [Zope-dev] xmlrpc: Syntax error at line 34: illegal characterin content

2001-05-10 Thread richard
Shane Hathaway wrote: > I feel like the absence of base-64 encoding is an oversight in the > protocol, along with the absence of a "null" type (which would correspond > to "None".) That's why I think it's not a kludge to extend XML-RPC. The omission of the explicit null is one of the oldest grip

Re: oodb philosophics ;) was: Re: [Zope-dev] Experiments with ORMapping

2001-05-10 Thread Cees de Groot
Shane Hathaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: >That's one reason ZODB is so nice. You can write an application without >writing a formal schema. > One of the reasons I am seriously considering to migrate our production database from PostgreSQL to ZODB. I am about to implement our product database, and