ÅóÓÑ£¬ÏòÄãÍƼöÒ»¸öÊ®·ÖÓÐȤµÄÍøÉϳåÀË׬Ǯ·½·¨£¬ÊÔÒ»ÊÔ°É£¡
http://www.cashfiesta.com/php/join.php?ref=cblxzy
Ö»ÒªÉÏÍø¾Í¿ÉÔÚÏß׬Ǯ£¬ºÎÀÖ¶ø²»Îª£¡Ç¿ÁÒÍƼö£¡Ö»ÒªÔÚÏ߾ͼÆÊý£¬1Сʱ0.6ÃÀÔ²£¡
Ç¿ÁÒÍƼö£¡Ö»ÒªÔÚÏ߾ͼÆÊý£¬1Сʱ0.6ÃÀÔ²£¡
ÓÐÐËȤһ±ßÉÏÍøÒ»±ß׬ǮÂð£¿
ÈçÓÐÐËȤÇ뻨ÉÙÉÙʱ¼ä¿´¿´ÕâƪÎÄÕ£¬ÕâÖ»»á
Hello:
I am the author of the CVSFile product, available at
http://www.zope.org/Members/arielpartners/CVSFile
I am thinking about implementing a new design, and wanted to get some
feedback from the list first (perhaps others have tried this approach?)
Here is a description of our problem:
Ext
> is bad. What happens
> when we switch to some other revision control tool (like clearcase,
> subversion, sourcesafe)? Either you
> have multiple classes like "CVS-XSLTFile, Clearcase-XSLTFile, etc." or a
> single class that knows
> about every possible version control system. yuk. Clearly
The current Zope cvs trunk now contains these changes. Check it out and
let me know if you find any gotchas!
-Casey
Didier Georgieff wrote:
> On Wed, 2002-03-27 at 17:31, Casey Duncan wrote:
>
>
>>ZClasses have been overlooked enough. Nobody has even bothered
>>putting a ZCatalogPathAware ava
Craeg K Strong writes:
> ...
> The Zope protocol handler idea is interesting, and I haven't thought
> this all the way through yet.
> Couldbe thought of as referring to "zope://blat"
> where the Zope protocol is the default
> and therefore omitted?
I do not think, this would be a good
On Thu, 2002-03-28 at 15:33, Matthew T. Kromer wrote:
> [...]
> FYI, Pythonlabs thinks there is more than one bug involved. The
> relevant report at sourceforge is:
>
>
> http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=105470&aid=535905&group_id=5470
That report marks the bug as closed a
On 3/30/02 5:55 AM, "Didier Georgieff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 2002-03-27 at 17:31, Casey Duncan wrote:
>
>> ZClasses have been overlooked enough. Nobody has even bothered
>> putting a ZCatalogPathAware available for them...
>
> I've done that locally (changing __init__ and the the
On Mon, 1 Apr 2002, Jeffrey P Shell wrote:
> If other people have come across this, I think finding a resolution to this
> would be a more-than-worthy 2.6 project. If I'm just smoking crack and it's
> only a ZPatterns/TransactionAgents behavior that I'm witnessing, then I'll
> just leave my huffi
On 4/1/02 5:59 PM, "R. David Murray" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 1 Apr 2002, Jeffrey P Shell wrote:
>> If other people have come across this, I think finding a resolution to this
>> would be a more-than-worthy 2.6 project. If I'm just smoking crack and it's
>> only a ZPatterns/Transacti
I have noticed on the DB lists lately some concern about the future of
Gadfly. I have been investigating a marvelous little open-source,
no copyright, SQL engine called
SQLite: An SQL
Database Engine In A C Library. I am quite experienced with
Python, reasonably experienced with Zope but a green
>>> Casey Duncan wrote
> I don't think this is a big enough change to warrant a real proposal, so
> I'll shoot this out here:
>
> Does anyone see a problem with changing the default generated
> constructor method for ZClasses to a python script in Zope 2.6?
+1.
There's always some funniness
11 matches
Mail list logo
