O... is this surfaced through the Zope undo tab?
Chris
Tim Peters wrote:
Update of /cvs-repository/Packages/ZODB
In directory cvs.zope.org:/tmp/cvs-serv29971/ZODB
Modified Files:
Tag: Zope-2_7-branch
FileStorage.py
Log Message:
UndoSearch._readnext(): Add the transaction size to
On 7/3/05, Andreas Jung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> the current release model of Zope 2 is based on doing at least one beta
> release for minor releases (Zope 2.7.X where X > 0). I have the strong
> impression that beta releases are not adopted and tested by most people.
> They usually use the "f
[Chris Withers]
> O... is this surfaced through the Zope undo tab?
Try it. I'm sure that was Dieter's intent:
http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zodb-dev/2003-October/006157.html
,,,'
The patch also enhances "FileStorage" and lets its "UndoSearch._readnext"
provide information
Hi!
Five comes with some code that bridges Zope 2 interfaces to Zope 3
interfaces. This way Zope 2 interface definitions can be reused without
adding redundant code.
This is quite useful, but doesn't work for Zope core interfaces: Five
depends one many Zope core packages and using Five code
On 7/6/05, yuppie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Five comes with some code that bridges Zope 2 interfaces to Zope 3
> interfaces. This way Zope 2 interface definitions can be reused without
> adding redundant code.
>
> This is quite useful, but doesn't work for Zope core interfaces: Five
> depends o
Lennart Regebro wrote:
On 7/6/05, yuppie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Five comes with some code that bridges Zope 2 interfaces to Zope 3
interfaces. This way Zope 2 interface definitions can be reused without
adding redundant code.
This is quite useful, but doesn't work for Zope core interfaces:
On 7/6/05, yuppie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Lennart Regebro wrote:
> > Did I understand that correctly, it is a problem if you want to use
> > Five *from* zope core code?
>
> Correct. It's not always a problem, but the bridging code doesn't depend
> on anything else in Five, so I guess moving t
