Summary of messages to the zope-tests list.
Period Wed Jan 11 12:01:02 2006 UTC to Thu Jan 12 12:01:02 2006 UTC.
There were 8 messages: 8 from Zope Unit Tests.
Tests passed OK
---
Subject: OK : Zope-2_6-branch Python-2.1.3 : Linux
From: Zope Unit Tests
Date: Wed Jan 11 21:02:47 EST 2
> > Hacking objectIds() as follows (diff against trunk pasted inline) -
> > gettting ids off of the meta type index for all used meta types -
> > seems to make things much quicker. Two questions:
>
> Are you sure this actually works? _mt_index.keys() is
> supposed to provide a list of all m
The Buildbot has detected a failed build of Zope branches 2.9 2.4 Linux
zc-buildbot.
Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.zope.org/
Build Reason: changes
Build Source Stamp: 2735
Blamelist: andreasjung,dobe,jinty,mkerrin,oestermeier,poster,tim_one,yuppie
BUILD FAILED: failed test
sincerely,
-The Bui
The Buildbot has detected a failed build of Zope trunk 2.4 Windows 2000
zc-bbwin6.
Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.zope.org/
Build Reason: changes
Build Source Stamp: 2734
Blamelist: andreasjung,dobe,jinty,mkerrin,oestermeier,poster,tim_one,yuppie
BUILD FAILED: failed failed slave lost
sincerely
The Buildbot has detected a failed build of Zope branches 2.9 2.4 Windows 2000
zc-bbwin2.
Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.zope.org/
Build Reason: changes
Build Source Stamp: 2735
Blamelist: andreasjung,dobe,jinty,mkerrin,oestermeier,poster,tim_one,yuppie
BUILD FAILED: failed failed slave lost
si
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have very large BTreeFolder2 (CMFMember via BaseBTreeFolder in Archetypes)
- has about 260k items in _tree - objectIds() is painfully slow, as is
self._tree.keys()
Independently of the fastest way, I'm curious what use case you have to
have a need to get all the keys
Most of the last two days I've been whacking on Zope 2.9 to build a
"Zope 2 style" Windows installer that bundles Python 2.4.2, and
cooperates with the new zpkgtools-created tarball layout. The
build-the-Windows-installer code got simpler as a result, but ...
This work is being done on branch:
Way to go Tim! You beat me to it. I was supposed to look at this soon
but got back from vacation just this tuesday. I will make sure your
installer gets testing and try to fix any eventual issues.
Thank you very much!
On Thu, Jan 12, 2006 at 07:25:35PM -0500, Tim Peters wrote:
| Most of the last
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm pretty sure this works.
Ok, I get it now. I misread it the first time.
This returns the equivalent of running
self.objectIds(spec=self._mt_index.keys()) on the current trunk/release
code, which should be identical to self._tree.keys(), but much, much faster.
I'm
