Re: [Zope-dev] 64-bit BTrees

Fred Drake wrote: (possibly named LLBTree, LOBTree, and OLBTree). For my half-penny's worth, this is the way I'd like to see it go. Explicit is better than implicit and all that. If you need more than 32-bits, you can explicitly use them. The implicit change to make them all 64-bits which res

[Zope-dev] cvs.zope.org/Products -> svn.zope.org?

Hi, almost all big Zope projects have changed to Subversion fortunately. Using svn:externals is a nice way to build bundles and helps a lot deploying software. However projects still have some dependencies from cvs.zope.org some older material (possibly not updated material). So the current sol

[Zope-dev] Re: Traversal issue which affects Five

Hi Alec, Five traversal is definitely very touchy, and the interactions with Zope numerous. So I'm sure the problem you observed is real and that a solution must be found. The unit tests you propose would go a long way to having a fix committed asap, so yes please, provide one. Florent Alec

Re: [Zope-dev] cvs.zope.org/Products -> svn.zope.org?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 17 Apr 2006, at 14:15, Andreas Jung wrote: Hi, almost all big Zope projects have changed to Subversion fortunately. Using svn:externals is a nice way to build bundles and helps a lot deploying software. However projects still have some depe

[Zope-dev] Re: Traversal issue which affects Five

On 4/17/06, Florent Guillaume <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Alec, > > Five traversal is definitely very touchy, and the interactions with Zope > numerous. So I'm sure the problem you observed is real and that a > solution must be found. The unit tests you propose would go a long way > to having a

Re: [Zope-dev] Traversal issue which affects Five

Alec Mitchell wrote at 2006-4-16 12:28 -0700: > ... >It seems that the way OFS.Traversable.restrictedTraverse() handles >security checking on objects with __bobo_traverse__ methods is >considerably different from the way it normally checks security. The >result is that traversal cannot obtain attr

Re: [Zope-dev] Re: 64-bit BTrees

Tres Seaver wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Jim Fulton wrote: Tres Seaver wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Fred Drake wrote: I have a need for 64-bit BTrees (at least for IOBTree and OIBTree), and I'm not the first. I've created a feature develo

Re: [ZODB-Dev] Re: [Zope-dev] Re: 64-bit BTrees

On 4/17/06, Jim Fulton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The fact that IIBTrees is so widely used is exatly the reason > I want to use 64-bits for the existing types rather than having to > introduce a new type. Oops, I was checking in the separated version of 64-bit BTrees while this was landing in my

[Zope-dev] Re: 64-bit BTrees

Fred Drake wrote: > I have a need for 64-bit BTrees (at least for IOBTree and OIBTree), > and I'm not the first. I've created a feature development branch for > this, and checked in my initial implementation. > > I've modified the existing code to use PY_LONG_LONG instead of int for > the key and

Re: [Zope-dev] Traversal issue which affects Five

On 4/17/06, Dieter Maurer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Alec Mitchell wrote at 2006-4-16 12:28 -0700: > > ... > >It seems that the way OFS.Traversable.restrictedTraverse() handles > >security checking on objects with __bobo_traverse__ methods is > >considerably different from the way it normally che

Re: [Zope-dev] cvs.zope.org/Products -> svn.zope.org?

--On 17. April 2006 16:25:10 +0200 Jens Vagelpohl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Wouldn't it make sense to migrate the complete Products hierarchy from cvs.zope.org to svn.zope.org? - -1 on migrating everything. IMHO it would be better to identify those dependencies and selectively migrate pro