Summary of messages to the zope-tests list.
Period Thu Jan 31 12:00:00 2008 UTC to Fri Feb 1 12:00:00 2008 UTC.
There were 5 messages: 5 from Zope Unit Tests.
Tests passed OK
---
Subject: OK : Zope-2.7 Python-2.3.6 : Linux
From: Zope Unit Tests
Date: Fri Feb 1 06:33:08 EST 2008
URL
On Friday 01 February 2008, Chris McDonough wrote:
> If there will continue to be a release schedule for "Zope 3, the appserver"
> It would reduce confusion to new users greatly to give the appserver
> release a name other than Zope.
Well, we had to do the classic Zope 3 release at least one more
I would say so also. Since z2, z3 both be released in future as eggs, I
I expect the only difference to be in kgs that ensures a working set of
packages (whether it is zope3, zope2, or for that matter any other project).
Any sort of release in the future should only reflect a state of a
workin
On Fri, Feb 1, 2008 at 9:22 AM, Chris McDonough <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'll take a risk by stating the obvious.
>
> If there will continue to be a release schedule for "Zope 3, the appserver"
> It
> would reduce confusion to new users greatly to give the appserver release a
> name
> othe
On Fri, Feb 1, 2008 at 9:42 AM, Chris McDonough <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've heard that rumored, but there's nothing indicating that in the release
> announcement. There are forward looking statements in there: "tarballs...
> for
> the last 3.4 series and probably for 3.5 as well." I ta
Hey,.
On Feb 1, 2008 4:09 PM, David Pratt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[snip]
> It might be nice for the marketing of zope to give each set of eggs a
> nice name. Just using familiar mozilla names as an illustration, see how
> nice zope-thunderbird or zope-firefox look. So do away with the kgs in
>
On Friday 01 February 2008, Jim Fulton wrote:
> - I think the goal of these releases is less to provide an application
> than to provide a possibly useful collection of some libraries. This
> is similar to the Python standard library. Some people see
> significant value in this. I believe
On Feb 1, 2008, at 9:42 AM, Chris McDonough wrote:
Tom Hoffman wrote:
On Fri, Feb 1, 2008 at 9:22 AM, Chris McDonough <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
I'll take a risk by stating the obvious.
If there will continue to be a release schedule for "Zope 3, the
appserver" It
would reduce confusion t
I'll take a risk by stating the obvious.
If there will continue to be a release schedule for "Zope 3, the appserver" It
would reduce confusion to new users greatly to give the appserver release a name
other than Zope.
Eg.
Current name Proposed name
Not responding to anyone in particular:
I see there are plenty people with opinions. I would love not to do the Zope 3
releases anymore! I am tired of the endless discussions.
Think I am frustrated? Absolutely!
All the suggestions made here require more work, more manpower. But there is
nobody
Hi Martijn. I am familiar with grok and the fun and welcoming community
you have created. With the perspective I have suggested, releases are
only sets with different names giving meaning to each set for developer
groups.
As a project, grok is currently pinning eggs but can also provide a kgs
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Chris McDonough wrote:
> Stephan Richter wrote:
>> On Friday 01 February 2008, Chris McDonough wrote:
>>> If there will continue to be a release schedule for "Zope 3, the appserver"
>>> It would reduce confusion to new users greatly to give the appserv
Stephan Richter wrote:
On Friday 01 February 2008, Chris McDonough wrote:
If there will continue to be a release schedule for "Zope 3, the appserver"
It would reduce confusion to new users greatly to give the appserver
release a name other than Zope.
Well, we had to do the classic Zope 3 relea
Tom Hoffman wrote:
On Fri, Feb 1, 2008 at 9:22 AM, Chris McDonough <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'll take a risk by stating the obvious.
If there will continue to be a release schedule for "Zope 3, the appserver" It
would reduce confusion to new users greatly to give the appserver release a
na
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Chris McDonough wrote:
> Stephan Richter wrote:
>> On Friday 01 February 2008, Chris McDonough wrote:
>>> If there will continue to be a release schedule for "Zope 3, the appserver"
>>> It would reduce confusion to new users greatly to give the appserv
Hey,
On Feb 1, 2008 6:11 PM, Stephan Richter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Friday 01 February 2008, Martijn Faassen wrote:
> > http://www.openplans.org/projects/zorg-redux
>
> This project does not seem to be public.
I don't know how it's been setup, but if you want to join I'm sure
Martin Aspe
On Friday 01 February 2008, Martijn Faassen wrote:
> http://www.openplans.org/projects/zorg-redux
This project does not seem to be public.
Regards,
Stephan
--
Stephan Richter
Web Software Design, Development and Training
Google me. "Zope Stephan Richter"
_
On Friday 01 February 2008, Tres Seaver wrote:
> > I typed four more paragraphs full of markety stuff here but deleted them.
> > It's not useful. If no one else thinks it's a good idea, I'm not going
> > to push either.
>
> I would favor the following for a roadmap going forward:
>
> - No more t
Stephan Richter a écrit :
Not responding to anyone in particular:
I see there are plenty people with opinions. I would love not to do the Zope 3
releases anymore! I am tired of the endless discussions.
Think I am frustrated? Absolutely!
All the suggestions made here require more work, more m
Hey,
On Feb 1, 2008 6:04 PM, Christophe Combelles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[snip]
> The transition seems now achieved and the most important thing is to have a
> dedicated web site with clear information, so that there are new users, and
> new
> contributors. When someone goes to the zope.org h
On Fri, Feb 01, 2008 at 11:06:48AM -0500, Chris McDonough wrote:
> I typed four more paragraphs full of markety stuff here but deleted them.
*cheers*
Marius Gedminas
--
The clothes have no emperor.
-- C.A.R. Hoare, commenting on ADA.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signatu
On Feb 2, 2008 12:09 AM, Martijn Faassen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hey,
>
> On Feb 1, 2008 6:04 PM, Christophe Combelles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [snip]
> > The transition seems now achieved and the most important thing is to have a
> > dedicated web site with clear information, so that ther
Hey,
On Feb 1, 2008 8:59 PM, Paul Carduner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[snip]
> I think the website is one of the huge impediments to joining the Zope
> community. When you compare zope.org to all the other web framework
> websites like django, turbogears, and RoR, it is pretty clear why
> people
I'll take that as STFU ;-)
Got it.
- C
Marius Gedminas wrote:
On Fri, Feb 01, 2008 at 11:06:48AM -0500, Chris McDonough wrote:
I typed four more paragraphs full of markety stuff here but deleted them.
*cheers*
Marius Gedminas
Christophe Combelles wrote:
Stephan Richter a écrit :
Not responding to anyone in particular:
I see there are plenty people with opinions. I would love not to do the Zope 3
releases anymore! I am tired of the endless discussions.
Think I am frustrated? Absolutely!
All the suggestions made h
Martin Aspeli wrote:
I think you're right on the money. I really have very little idea of how
Zope 3 is supposed to be used right now, or what "Zope 3" really is (and
no-one fully agrees, as evidenced by other posts in this thread). Having
to piece together that information from the mailing li
26 matches
Mail list logo
