Jodok Batlogg wrote:
and yes again. unfortunately there is no open source / non-google DB
application implementation so far. we keep this in mind.
There is http://hypertable.org, but of course that's not an application
engine.
\malthe
___
Zope-Dev
Summary of messages to the zope-tests list.
Period Thu May 22 11:00:00 2008 UTC to Fri May 23 11:00:00 2008 UTC.
There were 5 messages: 5 from Zope Tests.
Tests passed OK
---
Subject: OK : Zope-2.8 Python-2.3.6 : Linux
From: Zope Tests
Date: Thu May 22 21:05:48 EDT 2008
URL: http://m
Hi there,
Today I had a discussion with Jasper Spaans about how to go about
improving megrok.rdb, Grok's relational database integration which aims
to integrate Grok with SQLAlchemy. We started developing megrok.rdb at
the Grokkerdam sprint a few weeks ago. We reread the discussion
surroundin
Hi Jodok. I had looked at storm a while back but the zope integration
seemed to lack any relationship with zope schemas. I guess it is
possible to define a zope schema that is not persisted and create the
tables from it. It did not seem to me a good way of using CA. How are
you managing this p
David Pratt wrote:
Hi Jodok. I had looked at storm a while back but the zope integration
seemed to lack any relationship with zope schemas. I guess it is
possible to define a zope schema that is not persisted and create the
tables from it. It did not seem to me a good way of using CA. How are
Michael Howitz wrote at 2008-5-22 10:59 +0200:
> ...
>Am 22.05.2008 um 08:20 schrieb Dieter Maurer:
>> [...]
>> This looks like the misfeature "Zope does not start in debug mode
>> when a single product import fails". In non debug mode, product
>> import failures are logged but Zope nevertheless st
Hi Malthe. z3c.dobbin looks quite good and transparent. In my opinion,
this is much closer to what integration ought to look like for CA. BTW,
I noticed that z3c.dobbin is zpl but ore.alchemist that it depends on is
gpl. I think all the other zope flavors of sqlalchemy are under zpl. I
believe
Tres Seaver wrote at 2008-5-22 10:45 -0400:
>> ...
>> The fact is that right now, today, we still have code that relies on Z2
>> interfaces. Not just in third party products - current Zope2 releases
>> rely on Z2 interfaces in some places as well.
>
>Only by oversight, not by design (the only one I
David Pratt wrote:
Hi Malthe. z3c.dobbin looks quite good and transparent. In my opinion,
this is much closer to what integration ought to look like for CA. BTW,
I noticed that z3c.dobbin is zpl but ore.alchemist that it depends on is
gpl. I think all the other zope flavors of sqlalchemy are un
Wichert Akkerman wrote at 2008-5-22 20:23 +0200:
> ...
>> Code which claims to be "working" with Z2 interfaces is already
>> crippled: worse, it infects *other* code with that breakage. Such code
>> *never* worked properly (those interfaces were never supported by the
>> component architecture),
Hi Malthe. Perhaps I am wrong about the licensing situation. I guess its
a bit confusing since pypi indicates GPL and package ZPL. I guess I
should contact Kapil for clarification if I am interested in
experimenting here. Many thanks.
Regards,
David
name="ore.alchemist",
version="0.5.
Hi Malthe. Kapil has confirmed the licensing is ZPL with a version bump
to 0.5.2 with a change in the headers, etc. I am anxious to experiment
with dobbin since it looks so straight forward and nice. I guess I see
traversal and containers as possible issues but will be interested in
potential s
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dieter Maurer wrote:
> Tres Seaver wrote at 2008-5-22 10:45 -0400:
>>> ...
>>> The fact is that right now, today, we still have code that relies on Z2
>>> interfaces. Not just in third party products - current Zope2 releases
>>> rely on Z2 interfaces i
We need to differentiate between the interface for session configuration
and session usage from an application.
For session usage I think it is fairly simple. We should define an
ISessionContext interface such that:
class ISessionContext(Interface):
def __call__():
"return a sessi
David Pratt wrote:
Hi Malthe. Kapil has confirmed the licensing is ZPL with a version bump
to 0.5.2 with a change in the headers, etc. I am anxious to experiment
with dobbin since it looks so straight forward and nice. I guess I see
traversal and containers as possible issues but will be intere
15 matches
Mail list logo
