Re: [Zope-dev] trying out the buildout-based Zope 2.12...

2009-03-30 Thread Jim Fulton
On Mar 29, 2009, at 4:10 PM, Wichert Akkerman wrote: ... You can compare this with dpkg and apt on Debian and Ubuntu systems: dpkg is the lower level install that installs one or more packages. It only checks if the packages you install break any package conflicts and if their dependencies

Re: [Zope-dev] trying out the buildout-based Zope 2.12...

2009-03-30 Thread Wichert Akkerman
On 3/30/09 4:04 PM, Jim Fulton wrote: On Mar 29, 2009, at 4:10 PM, Wichert Akkerman wrote: ... You can compare this with dpkg and apt on Debian and Ubuntu systems: dpkg is the lower level install that installs one or more packages. It only checks if the packages you install break any package

[Zope-dev] ZEO for Zope 2.12.0a1 from buildout with no funky recipes ; -)

2009-03-30 Thread Chris Withers
Hi, Well, I made some progress in that ZEO instances are just fine to get going. Here's the buildout.cfg: [buildout] parts = zeoinstance extends = versions2.cfg [zeoinstance] recipe = zc.recipe.egg eggs = ZODB3 entry-points= runzeo=ZEO.runzeo:main zeoctl=ZEO.zeoctl:main

Re: [Zope-dev] trying out the buildout-based Zope 2.12...

2009-03-30 Thread Paul Winkler
On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 11:47:14AM -0400, Jim Fulton wrote: I think an implementation of a better dependency resolution strategy in buildout would be a good place to start. I think some limited backtracking could go a long way. Anyone interested in working on this? Ian's Pip tool tries to

Re: [Zope-dev] trying out the buildout-based Zope 2.12...

2009-03-30 Thread Andreas Jung
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 30.03.2009 11:08 Uhr, Paul Winkler wrote: On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 11:47:14AM -0400, Jim Fulton wrote: I think an implementation of a better dependency resolution strategy in buildout would be a good place to start. I think some limited

Re: [Zope-dev] trying out the buildout-based Zope 2.12...

2009-03-30 Thread Jim Fulton
On Mar 30, 2009, at 12:08 PM, Paul Winkler wrote: On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 11:47:14AM -0400, Jim Fulton wrote: I think an implementation of a better dependency resolution strategy in buildout would be a good place to start. I think some limited backtracking could go a long way. Anyone

Re: [Zope-dev] trying out the buildout-based Zope 2.12...

2009-03-30 Thread Paul Winkler
On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 12:29:16PM -0400, Jim Fulton wrote: On Mar 30, 2009, at 12:08 PM, Paul Winkler wrote: Ian's Pip tool tries to download everything and work out the complete graph before doing any installation; I've no idea if any of that work could be ported to buildout, but it might be

Re: [Zope-dev] Zope and Cygwin

2009-03-30 Thread Cesar Canassa
It would be possible to modify the plonectl script in order to make it run without using the zdaemon? Similar to way that the runzope used to work. I am using the Plone unified installer, it doesn't comes with the runzope script. Thanks, Cesar 2009/3/29 Dieter Maurer die...@handshake.de Cesar

[Zope-dev] Buildbot for Zope 3

2009-03-30 Thread Sebastien Douche
Hi, sad time for zope 3: http://zope.buildbot.securactive.org/waterfall Tell me if you other things (I want repoze, python and Tarek's distutils). -- Sebastien Douche sdou...@gmail.com ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org

Re: [Zope-dev] snakebite

2009-03-30 Thread Martijn Faassen
Hey, On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 4:46 AM, Adam GROSZER agros...@gmail.com wrote: Any chance on beating on this? Or somewhere else to have a buildbot slave on win32? Just touched zc.buildout trunk and it seems to fail miserably on win32. Hey, I'd be very happy is someone took the initiative of