Martin Aspeli wrote:
If we do that, I'd also suggest we use the 'buildout.dumppickedversions'
extension. This prints the picked versions with some explanation about
what required them, either to a file or to the console. This is a useful
sanity check: if you see a package in there that
On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 2:51 AM, Martin Aspeli optilude+li...@gmail.com wrote:
I know a lot of people are using testrecorder with Plone. That doesn't
mean it has to be in the ZTK of course.
Never heard of anyone who did. zope.testbrowser is used quite a bit,
if that's what you meant.
Hanno
Chris Withers wrote:
Martin Aspeli wrote:
If we do that, I'd also suggest we use the 'buildout.dumppickedversions'
extension. This prints the picked versions with some explanation about
what required them, either to a file or to the console. This is a useful
sanity check: if you see a
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 8:50 PM, Martin Aspeli optilude+li...@gmail.com wrote:
Hanno Schlichting wrote:
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 10:29 PM, Martijn Faassen faas...@startifact.com
wrote:
[ztk.cfg] contains a line
allow-picked-versions = false
I agree with Thomas that we should remove this
Jim Fulton wrote:
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 8:50 PM, Martin Aspeli optilude+li...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hanno Schlichting wrote:
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 10:29 PM, Martijn Faassen faas...@startifact.com
wrote:
[ztk.cfg] contains a line
allow-picked-versions = false
I agree with Thomas that
Summary of messages to the zope-tests list.
Period Wed Oct 7 12:00:00 2009 UTC to Thu Oct 8 12:00:00 2009 UTC.
There were 8 messages: 8 from Zope Tests.
Tests passed OK
---
Subject: OK : Zope-2.10 Python-2.4.6 : Linux
From: Zope Tests
Date: Wed Oct 7 20:48:56 EDT 2009
URL:
Martin Aspeli wrote:
Hanno Schlichting wrote:
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 10:29 PM, Martijn Faassen faas...@startifact.com
wrote:
[ztk.cfg] contains a line
allow-picked-versions = false
I agree with Thomas that we should remove this from ztk.cfg, as if we
publish this for reuse we don't
On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 2:59 PM, Martijn Faassen faas...@startifact.com wrote:
Martin Aspeli wrote:
If we do that, I'd also suggest we use the 'buildout.dumppickedversions'
extension.
Does that make sense? After all, if we say allow-picked-version is
false, there never will *be* any picked
Martijn Faassen wrote:
Martin Aspeli wrote:
Hanno Schlichting wrote:
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 10:29 PM, Martijn Faassen
faas...@startifact.com wrote:
[ztk.cfg] contains a line
allow-picked-versions = false
I agree with Thomas that we should remove this from ztk.cfg, as if we
publish
Hi Christian,
On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 2:00 PM, Christian Theune c...@gocept.com wrote:
Hi,
I *thought* the test runner had a feature to run tests in randomized
order, but I can't find it. Is that something that Zope 2 had and that
was never ported to zope.testing?
I couldn't find in the
Hanno Schlichting wrote:
On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 2:59 PM, Martijn Faassen faas...@startifact.com
wrote:
Martin Aspeli wrote:
If we do that, I'd also suggest we use the 'buildout.dumppickedversions'
extension.
Does that make sense? After all, if we say allow-picked-version is
false, there
Martin Aspeli wrote:
Right, sorry, I must've been tired when I read this. In my mind, I read
it as disallow-picked-versions = false. :)
No, I'm not crazy after all. The thread is about *removing*
allow-picked-versions=false i.e. allowing versions to be picked. I
don't not hate those double
We recently were bit by a segfault bug in zope.security
(https://bugs.launchpad.net/zope3/+bug/181833) when migrating an
application from Python 2.4 to 2.6. The newest zope.security (3.7.1,
http://pypi.python.org/pypi/zope.security/3.7.1#id1) has a fix for the
bug.
We noticed that the KGS
Martin Aspeli wrote:
Martin Aspeli wrote:
Right, sorry, I must've been tired when I read this. In my mind, I read
it as disallow-picked-versions = false. :)
No, I'm not crazy after all. The thread is about *removing*
allow-picked-versions=false i.e. allowing versions to be picked. I
Tarek Ziade wrote:
Log message for revision 104933:
comparing requirement locations instead of requirement objects
Did I miss the CHANGES.txt update?
Regards,
Martijn
___
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 5:15 PM, John Murphy jac...@zope.com wrote:
We recently were bit by a segfault bug in zope.security
(https://bugs.launchpad.net/zope3/+bug/181833) when migrating an
application from Python 2.4 to 2.6. The newest zope.security (3.7.1,
I think you will need to update your own application specific version
set. The Zope 3 KGS is currently unmaintained. The future of the Zope
3 project is currently unknown. The last release has been eight months
ago and there is currently no active maintenance going on.
My bad, I should've
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Martin Aspeli wrote:
Tres Seaver tseaver at palladion.com writes:
There is no way to tell the difference between a WebDAV GET and a
normal browser GET, period: the specs explicitly, deliberately
overload the GET verb.
Hence the IANA-assigned
Tres Seaver wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Martin Aspeli wrote:
Tres Seaver tseaver at palladion.com writes:
There is no way to tell the difference between a WebDAV GET and a
normal browser GET, period: the specs explicitly, deliberately
overload the GET verb.
19 matches
Mail list logo
