Wouldn't it be better to just move IPubFailure before the abort? Is
there a reason for subscribing to such an event which would required
the transaction to be aborted already? I can see the usefulness of the
transaction being already doom()ed before this event, but not aborted.
On Wed, Nov 11, 200
Leonardo Rochael Almeida wrote:
> Wouldn't it be better to just move IPubFailure before the abort? Is
> there a reason for subscribing to such an event which would required
> the transaction to be aborted already? I can see the usefulness of the
> transaction being already doom()ed before this even
Summary of messages to the zope-tests list.
Period Wed Nov 11 12:00:00 2009 UTC to Thu Nov 12 12:00:00 2009 UTC.
There were 7 messages: 1 from Carlos.Solis, 6 from Zope Tests.
Unknown
---
Subject: Automated Acceptance Test
From: Carlos.Solis
Date: Wed Nov 11 12:37:04 EST 2009
URL: http://mai
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 12:29, Martin Aspeli wrote:
> Leonardo Rochael Almeida wrote:
>> Wouldn't it be better to just move IPubFailure before the abort? [...]
>> I can see the usefulness of the
>> transaction being already doom()ed before this event, but not aborted.
>
> There is an IPubSuccess w
