Re: [Zope-dev] RFC: proposal to split zope.configuration into ZCML and non-ZCML related packages

2011-08-31 Thread Wolfgang Schnerring
* Chris McDonough [2011-08-28 21:35]: > Pyramid doesn't actually require ZCML or zope.schema; it only uses > the parts of zope.configuration related to actions, conflict > resolution, and the "ConfigurationMachine" itself. These bits have > proven useful outside the context of ZCML and other schem

Re: [Zope-dev] RFC: proposal to split zope.configuration into ZCML and non-ZCML related packages

2011-08-31 Thread Hanno Schlichting
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 9:17 AM, Wolfgang Schnerring wrote: > Splitting zope.configuration into core mechanics and ZCML support > makes a lot of sense to me. > > So, +1 from me. +1 here too Hanno ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org https://mail

[Zope-dev] zope-tests - FAILED: 10, OK: 31, UNKNOWN: 1

2011-08-31 Thread Zope tests summarizer
This is the summary for test reports received on the zope-tests list between 2011-08-30 00:00:00 UTC and 2011-08-31 00:00:00 UTC: See the footnotes for test reports of unsuccessful builds. An up-to date view of the builders is also available in our buildbot documentation: http://docs.zope.org/

Re: [Zope-dev] RFC: Proposal for merging jbohman-zope.registry branch of zope.component

2011-08-31 Thread Wolfgang Schnerring
* Jim Fulton [2011-08-30 09:25]: > On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 2:23 AM, Wolfgang Schnerring wrote: > > My understanding is that from a client's perspective these two are > > equivalent: if you want the foo functionality for zope.component, you > > have to depend on zope.component[foo], and you import