* Jim Fulton <j...@zope.com> [2011-08-30 09:25]:
> On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 2:23 AM, Wolfgang Schnerring <w...@gocept.com> wrote:
> > My understanding is that from a client's perspective these two are
> > equivalent: if you want the foo functionality for zope.component, you
> > have to depend on zope.component[foo], and you import stuff from
> > zope.component.foo.
> Except that probably many (most?) clients of zope.component don't
> bother to name the extras because they depend on the other
> dependencies anyway, for other reasons.
Yes, right, I see that now. Thanks for clarifying!
Hmm, I guess I'm going to lose if I try to argue that not naming the
extra is "wrong" and thus deserves no respect or compatibility
protection, am I not?
Wolfgang Schnerring · w...@gocept.com · software development
gocept gmbh & co. kg · forsterstraße 29 · 06112 halle (saale) · germany
http://gocept.com · tel +49 345 219401 0 · fax +49 345 1229889 1
Python, Pyramid, Plone, Zope - consulting, development, hosting
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
(Related lists -