On 24.06.09 12:29, Fabio Tranchitella wrote:
> * 2009-06-24 12:26, Jim Fulton wrote:
>
>> So then, how soon would 2.12 need to be released for you to not drop
>> debian support for Zope 2 and Plone?
>>
> The problem is not Zope by itself but Plone, which still needs Zope 2.10,
> which in
* 2009-06-24 12:26, Jim Fulton wrote:
> So then, how soon would 2.12 need to be released for you to not drop
> debian support for Zope 2 and Plone?
The problem is not Zope by itself but Plone, which still needs Zope 2.10,
which in turn requires python 2.4.
It seems that a new major release of P
On Jun 24, 2009, at 5:43 AM, Fabio Tranchitella wrote:
> * 2009-06-24 11:39, Jim Fulton wrote:
The main problem for Zope2 is that the current stable upstream
branch
(2.12) still requires python2.4.
>
> My fault, I meant 2.11 (which is the current stable).
So then, how soon woul
* 2009-06-24 11:39, Jim Fulton wrote:
> >> The main problem for Zope2 is that the current stable upstream branch
> >> (2.12) still requires python2.4.
My fault, I meant 2.11 (which is the current stable).
--
Fabio Tranchitella http://www.kobold.it
Free Software Developer
On Jun 23, 2009, at 4:20 PM, Tres Seaver wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Fabio Tranchitella wrote:
>
>> Zope 2 and Plone
>>
>>
>> Zope 2 and Plone are obviously related, so the future of one of the
>> two
>> influences the other one.
>>
>> The main