- Original Message -
From: "David Goodger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Richard Jones" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Max M" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Andreas
Jung" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, Sep
Richard Jones wrote:
> [courtesy cc send to David G, so if I make any blatantly errneous statements
> he can come chase me with the Big Stick :)]
Thanks for being a vocal proponent!
> On Wed, 4 Sep 2002 8:01 pm, Max M wrote:
>> Andreas Jung wrote:
>>> I would be fine to have reStructuredText ins
On Thursday 05 September 2002 03:45 am, Max M wrote:
[snip]
>
> In userland indentation is actually a hard problem.
>
>
> regards Max M
http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
Indeed, most normal humans have trouble with understanding nested hierarchies.
Something which we geeks often
Richard Jones wrote:
>One of the big issues is that rest isn't optimised. I don't know what the
>scope is for optimising rest, nor have I got any real benchmark numbers. The
>emphasis so far has been to build it to spec. It's potentially much slower
>than stx because the latter has been around
[courtesy cc send to David G, so if I make any blatantly errneous statements
he can come chase me with the Big Stick :)]
On Wed, 4 Sep 2002 8:01 pm, Max M wrote:
> Andreas Jung wrote:
> >I would be fine to have reStructuredText inside the Zope core (for 2.7)
> >and to deprecate the current Stru
Andreas Jung wrote:
>I would be fine to have reStructuredText inside the Zope core (for 2.7)
>and to deprecate the current StructuredText in the long run.
>
+1
>Open points: how to migrate exisiting STX documents to reStructuredText
>
>
Wouldn't the simplest solution be:
???
Then we
The exisiting implementation of StructuredText in Zope has
several disadvantages:
- its behaviour depends on the locale settings (letters and punctuation
is taken from the locale settings). In some case the locale settings
are imcomplete (characters ¡ and ¿ are not available through the
