----- Original Message ----- From: "David Goodger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Richard Jones" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Max M" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Andreas Jung" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2002 06:35 Subject: Re: [Zope-dev] Future of StructuredText
> > > It's potentially much slower than stx because the latter has been around for > > longer and therefore is potentially more tweaked. > > I'd say ST (classic, anyhow; never grokked the NG code) is faster simply > because it does much less. ;-) In deed - on the other side you could work with caches. Either on the restructuredText side to keep the cooked HTML, or you as RAM manager on the Zope level or Apache/Squid before the Zope instance. -aj _______________________________________________ Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
