----- Original Message -----
From: "David Goodger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Richard Jones" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Max M" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Andreas
Jung" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2002 06:35
Subject: Re: [Zope-dev] Future of StructuredText


>
> > It's potentially much slower than stx because the latter has been around
for
> > longer and therefore is potentially more tweaked.
>
> I'd say ST (classic, anyhow; never grokked the NG code) is faster simply
> because it does much less. ;-)

In deed - on the other side you could work with caches. Either on the
restructuredText
side to keep the cooked HTML, or you as RAM manager on the Zope level or
Apache/Squid before the Zope instance.

-aj



_______________________________________________
Zope-Dev maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )

Reply via email to