Re: [Zope-dev] One z3c.rml test failure on Linux -- bug in ReportLab?

2010-12-21 Thread Stephan Richter
On Tuesday, December 21, 2010, Marius Gedminas wrote: > So you're saying this is a bug in z3c.rml after all? It ends up not > using separate subprocesses for each test? It runs all tests twice, once with and once without the subprocess version. Regards, Stephan -- Entrepreneur and Software Geek

Re: [Zope-dev] One z3c.rml test failure on Linux -- bug in ReportLab?

2010-12-21 Thread Marius Gedminas
On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 10:46:55PM -0500, Stephan Richter wrote: > On Monday, December 20, 2010, Marius Gedminas wrote: > > I'm not familiar with z3c.rml nor with ReportLab's form code, so I'd > > appreciate if people who wrote the test could help with the smaller > > reproducible example. > > Tha

Re: [Zope-dev] One z3c.rml test failure on Linux -- bug in ReportLab?

2010-12-20 Thread Stephan Richter
On Monday, December 20, 2010, Marius Gedminas wrote: > ve poked at this test failure a bit, and I suspect a bug in ReportLab. > It appears that creating two documents that use PDF forms will clobber > over a global object's -- reportlab.pdfbase.pdfform.GLOBALRESOURCES -- > __InternalName__ attribut

[Zope-dev] One z3c.rml test failure on Linux -- bug in ReportLab?

2010-12-20 Thread Marius Gedminas
I'm not myself familiar with z3c.rml, but I was debugging a buildbot failure and found what I think is a bug in ReportLab 2.5. Try this: svn co svn://svn.zope.org/repos/main/z3c.rml/trunk z3c.rml cd z3c.rml python bootstrap.py bin/buildout bin/test I get one test failure in z3c.rml.tes