[Zope-dev] Re: [Checkins] SVN: Zope/branches/2.10/ OFS Image: Image and File now both support simple unicode objects for data (they function the same as strings for data).

2006-06-28 Thread Florent Guillaume
Rocky Burt wrote: On Wed, 2006-28-06 at 14:01 +0200, Andreas Jung wrote: Has this change been discussed? I don't agree with it. Unicode strings aren't byte strings. File and Image should only work with byte strings. Code dealing with them should always know and assume that they use str. Anythin

Re: [Zope-dev] Re: [Checkins] SVN: Zope/branches/2.10/ OFS Image: Image and File now both support simple unicode objects for data (they function the same as strings for data).

2006-06-28 Thread Andreas Jung
--On 28. Juni 2006 13:56:58 +0200 Florent Guillaume <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Has this change been discussed? I don't agree with it. Unicode strings aren't byte strings. File and Image should only work with byte strings. Code dealing with them should always know and assume that they use str.

Re: [Zope-dev] Re: [Checkins] SVN: Zope/branches/2.10/ OFS Image: Image and File now both support simple unicode objects for data (they function the same as strings for data).

2006-06-28 Thread Christian Theune
Florent Guillaume wrote: Has this change been discussed? I don't agree with it. Unicode strings aren't byte strings. File and Image should only work with byte strings. Code dealing with them should always know and assume that they use str. Anything using unicode with them is broken or has done

[Zope-dev] Re: [Checkins] SVN: Zope/branches/2.10/ OFS Image: Image and File now both support simple unicode objects for data (they function the same as strings for data).

2006-06-28 Thread Florent Guillaume
Has this change been discussed? I don't agree with it. Unicode strings aren't byte strings. File and Image should only work with byte strings. Code dealing with them should always know and assume that they use str. Anything using unicode with them is broken or has done insufficient input val