"Jay, Dylan" wrote:
> There has to be some way round that. Is the REMOTE_USER variable still pased
> in even if zope isn't in remote user mode? Couldn't a user folder be
> implemented to use it?
nope.
REMOTE_USER is passed when the web server (IIS in our case) has done the
*authentication* and sai
> -Original Message-
> From: Jephte CLAIN [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, 4 December 2001 5:51 PM
> To: Jay, Dylan
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Zope-Annce] jcNTUserFolder 0.2.1 released
>
>
> "Jay, Dylan" wrote:
> > One way is to not replicate the challenge-respons
"Jay, Dylan" wrote:
> One way is to not replicate the challenge-response functionatlity at all.
this is the solution i have opted for. it has run now for two years :-)
the problem is Zope cannot be in remote user mode and in normal mode at
the same time. I think that setting up a zeo cluster (one
One way is to not replicate the challenge-response functionatlity at all.
Put Zope behind IIS in two spots. One which is protected and thus elicits a
challenge/response and another that has IIS anoymous access on it. Then get
the zope security machinery to alternate between the two urls depending
"Jay, Dylan" wrote:
> Can I ask you a question? Something I;ve tried to do in the past with
> jcNTUserFolder (maybe not tried hard enough) is this. I want all my users to
> be authenticated via challenge-response mechanism such that no one has to
> enter a username or password.
> >From what I can
