(I took the ZEO mail list out of the loop)...
> [Agreed. Ill CC zope-dev and I suggest we continue there.]
>
> Sorry, I phrased my question ambiguously.
>
> I meant, do you think a TTW development approach is viable for
applications
> with a non-trivial amount of logic?
Perhaps not. Not yet
> > >But there are
> > >really
> > >two ways to do this, either of which is viable.
> >
> > 1. the right way ;-)
> >
> > >2. Code all of your logic using TTW stuff and Zope
> components. Use the
> > >Publisher.Test.test method to call methods of your
> Zope components
> > >in unit tes
We're using ZCVSMixin for just such a scenario. It's working a
lot better than nothing. ;-) It does still have rough edges, and you
need to know too much about how it works to do anything complex, but
it does allow us to manage changes and test/stage/update etc with
a much greater degree of cont
> > One of the reasons our group is moving away from Zope is that it has
> > very poor support (if any) for the development/staging/live model. We
> > like this model. We think it's a good thing. But sync'ing code across
> > multiple Zope installations is a royal PITA.
>
> I'd like to hear more
