> I agree. Is there any reason for ZODB to actually keep timestamps rather
> than just use serial version ids?
Most storages need a timestamp anyway for time-related packing.
> (I understand calls to get the system tiem are expensive, incrementing an
> integer number by one should be somewhat les
Jim Fulton wrote:
For example, Zope 3 tracks creation and modification times that have
nothing
to do with database time stamps.
I agree. Is there any reason for ZODB to actually keep timestamps rather than
just use serial version ids?
(I understand calls to get the system tiem are expensive,
