Janko Hauser wrote:
Martijn Faassen wrote:
There's the 'approach' and the implementation. The approach is
fairly clear: a focus on baby steps to integrate into Zope 2.7. The
aim is to introduce as much as possible as make sense of Zope 3
facilities into Zope 2.
Besides ourself also Christian H
Janko Hauser wrote:
...
Will this monkeypatch be somewhat of a blessed way to include view
adapters into zope2?
Yes, subject to my review. :)
Perhaps the monkey patch can be integrated into 2.8.
> Than we
can replace our current approach of using view adapters in union.cms
with this one.
Or will
Martijn Faassen wrote:
There's the 'approach' and the implementation. The approach is fairly
clear: a focus on baby steps to integrate into Zope 2.7. The aim is to
introduce as much as possible as make sense of Zope 3 facilities into
Zope 2.
Besides ourself also Christian Heimes has done a more
Jim Fulton wrote:
Raphael Ritz wrote:
Thanks for this clairification, Jim.
Alan, does that address your concerns?
Any reasons left, not to adopt the five approach to Zope 3?
Just understand that the Five approach is still being developed, so there's
nothing to "adopt" yet. :) But I certainly enco
Raphael Ritz wrote:
Jim Fulton wrote:
I heard that there was some discussion about the relationship between
Martijn Faassen's "Five" project and future versions of Zope.
I'd like to say, for the record, that I think Five is an important
project. It is one of a number of projects to work out how to