--On Montag, 31. Januar 2005 20:20 Uhr +0100 Dieter Maurer
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I am not with you with respect to "number of indexed objects"
versus "size of the index". In fact *BOTH* as index specific
(otherwise, it would not make any sense to list it in an index
specific column).
Maybe,
Andreas Jung wrote at 2005-1-31 18:50 +0100:
> ...
[AJ]
>>> - some indexes show the number of indexed objects vs the number of
>>> indexes terms
>>>within the ZMI which is totally inconsistent. I think the ZMI should
>>> show the number
>>>of indexed objects. Index specific information e.g
--On Sonntag, 30. Januar 2005 19:17 Uhr +0100 Dieter Maurer
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
- some indexes show the number of indexed objects vs the number of
indexes terms
within the ZMI which is totally inconsistent. I think the ZMI should
show the number
of indexed objects. Index specific i
Andreas Jung wrote at 2005-1-30 15:30 +0100:
> ...
>Outstanding issues:
>
> - some indexes show the number of indexed objects vs the number of indexes
>terms
>within the ZMI which is totally inconsistent. I think the ZMI should
>show the number
>of indexed objects. Index specific informat
I changed the ZCatalog and indexes codebase for Zope 2.8 in the following
way:
- ZCatalog and indexes derived from UnIndex used a nasty implementation of
__len__
which lead to problems in Zope 2.8 with new-style classes. The
corresponding code
has been cleaned up. For ZCatalog instances t
