Re: [Zope-dev] choice of test runner...

2009-03-09 Thread Tres Seaver
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Martijn Faassen wrote: > Chris Withers wrote: >> Wichert Akkerman wrote: >>> I would like to see a move away from zope testing frameworks to a more >>> standard testing infrastructure: setup.py test, possibly combined with >>> using nose. >> I'd love t

Re: [Zope-dev] choice of test runner...

2009-03-09 Thread Jim Fulton
On Mar 9, 2009, at 6:32 PM, Martijn Faassen wrote: > Chris Withers wrote: >> Wichert Akkerman wrote: >>> I would like to see a move away from zope testing frameworks to a >>> more >>> standard testing infrastructure: setup.py test, possibly combined >>> with >>> using nose. >> >> I'd love to

Re: [Zope-dev] choice of test runner...

2009-03-09 Thread Martijn Faassen
Chris Withers wrote: > Wichert Akkerman wrote: >> I would like to see a move away from zope testing frameworks to a more >> standard testing infrastructure: setup.py test, possibly combined with >> using nose. > > I'd love to see a side-by-side feature comparison of the major python > test discov

Re: [Zope-dev] choice of test runner...

2009-03-08 Thread Dan Korostelev
2009/3/8 Chris Withers : > Wichert Akkerman wrote: >> I would like to see a move away from zope testing frameworks to a more >> standard testing infrastructure: setup.py test, possibly combined with >> using nose. > > I'd love to see a side-by-side feature comparison of the major python > test disc

[Zope-dev] choice of test runner...

2009-03-08 Thread Chris Withers
Wichert Akkerman wrote: > I would like to see a move away from zope testing frameworks to a more > standard testing infrastructure: setup.py test, possibly combined with > using nose. I'd love to see a side-by-side feature comparison of the major python test discovering and runner frameworks. It