Chris Withers wrote: > Wichert Akkerman wrote: >> I would like to see a move away from zope testing frameworks to a more >> standard testing infrastructure: setup.py test, possibly combined with >> using nose. > > I'd love to see a side-by-side feature comparison of the major python > test discovering and runner frameworks. It would then be interesting to > see if there's a compelling enough reason for The Zope Framework > steering committee to make a pronouncement on which one to use...
My initial reaction is that the zope.testrunner is enormously featureful, we're using quite a few of those features, and it's being actively maintained. I think going to nose would be a lot of work without compelling new features, and I see little gain in that. I would like setup.py test to be supported somehow if possible. I believe some people have done experiments with this. Tres, do you have any experience with this? Regards, Martijn _______________________________________________ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
