Re: [Zope-dev] tortoise v. hare (was: BTrees strangeness)

2004-05-19 Thread Jamie Heilman
Chris McDonough wrote: > I've looked at that issue many times during various bug days and it > sounded reasonable enough but it always seemed like slightly > higher-hanging fruit than other issues because it introduces new > features as well as fixes bugs. Oh granted, it totally is. It just happe

Re: [Zope-dev] tortoise v. hare (was: BTrees strangeness)

2004-05-19 Thread Chris McDonough
On Wed, 2004-05-19 at 16:29, Jamie Heilman wrote: > Chris McDonough wrote: > > Personally I prefer that someone who wants to introduce new features > > (even small ones, like API additions) into the core do it via their own > > committer privileges and thus sign up to maintain it for the rest of >

Re: [Zope-dev] tortoise v. hare (was: BTrees strangeness)

2004-05-19 Thread Chris McDonough
I've looked at that issue many times during various bug days and it sounded reasonable enough but it always seemed like slightly higher-hanging fruit than other issues because it introduces new features as well as fixes bugs. Personally I prefer that someone who wants to introduce new features (ev

[Zope-dev] tortoise v. hare (was: BTrees strangeness)

2004-05-19 Thread Jamie Heilman
Tres Seaver wrote: > > We should have a 'hasattr-geddon' and remove every trace of that > monstrosity from Zope and the CMF; likewise a 'bareexcept-geddon' > (there might be a few places which are smart enough to do 'except:', but > I doubt it). Now its not a geddon by any means, but the code