AW: AW: [Zope-dev] Re: Request typing (to get the xmlrpc layer discussionfinished)

2007-12-18 Thread Roger Ineichen
HI Jim Betreff: Re: AW: [Zope-dev] Re: Request typing (to get the xmlrpc layer discussionfinished) [...] Configure views on layers will prevent us form backdoors if we reuse this easy installable eggs ;-) Here is a simple sample of such a built-in backdoor: At our fresh zope

Re: AW: AW: [Zope-dev] Re: Request typing (to get the xmlrpc layer discussionfinished)

2007-12-18 Thread Jim Fulton
On Dec 18, 2007, at 5:08 AM, Roger Ineichen wrote: HI Jim Betreff: Re: AW: [Zope-dev] Re: Request typing (to get the xmlrpc layer discussionfinished) [...] Configure views on layers will prevent us form backdoors if we reuse this easy installable eggs ;-) Here is a simple sample

Re: AW: AW: [Zope-dev] Re: Request typing (to get the xmlrpc layer discussionfinished)

2007-12-18 Thread Stephan Richter
On Tuesday 18 December 2007, Jim Fulton wrote: If we register absolute_url in a layer which isn't used in a skin, then this view is not available as traversable view because of the missing layer/named skin configuration. Which does nothing to protect you from components registered for

AW: [Zope-dev] Re: Request typing (to get the xmlrpc layer discussionfinished)

2007-12-17 Thread Roger Ineichen
Hi Betreff: [Zope-dev] Re: Request typing (to get the xmlrpc layer discussionfinished) [...] We tend to think up complex use cases and then make the zope framework more complicated to deal with them. Sometimes these are legitimate use cases, but they are rarely common cases and

Re: AW: [Zope-dev] Re: Request typing (to get the xmlrpc layer discussionfinished)

2007-12-17 Thread Jim Fulton
On Dec 17, 2007, at 12:39 PM, Roger Ineichen wrote: Hi Betreff: [Zope-dev] Re: Request typing (to get the xmlrpc layer discussionfinished) [...] We tend to think up complex use cases and then make the zope framework more complicated to deal with them. Sometimes these are legitimate