-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Martijn Faassen wrote:
> We might consider moving IContained to zope.location - it just
> subclasses from ILocation after all and doesn't add anything besides
> being a marker interface. zope.intid already depends on zope.location.
> The Contained
On 5/15/09 6:27 AM, Fred Drake wrote:
> On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 2:57 AM, Chris McDonough wrote:
>> It's a partial step towards getting rid of a dependency that zope.intid has
>> on
>> zope.container. I'm thinking that maybe that IContained interface belongs in
>> some other package (e.g. maybe z
Stephan Richter wrote:
> On Friday 15 May 2009, Fred Drake wrote:
>> Keeping the dependency graph clean is great, and there's plenty to do
>> there. But there's also something to be said about being able to keep
>> a substantial portion of it in your head. The cleanliness of the
>> graph isn't so
On Friday 15 May 2009, Fred Drake wrote:
> Keeping the dependency graph clean is great, and there's plenty to do
> there. But there's also something to be said about being able to keep
> a substantial portion of it in your head. The cleanliness of the
> graph isn't so important if most users still
Fred Drake wrote:
> On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 2:57 AM, Chris McDonough wrote:
>> It's a partial step towards getting rid of a dependency that zope.intid has
>> on
>> zope.container. I'm thinking that maybe that IContained interface belongs in
>> some other package (e.g. maybe zope.contained). Tha
Chris McDonough wrote:
> On 5/15/09 2:46 AM, Michael Howitz wrote:
>> Am 15.05.2009 um 05:32 schrieb Chris McDonough:
>>
>>> Log message for revision 99961:
>>> - Remove a dependency on ``zope.container.contained.Contained``
>>> (this is a dumb base class that defines __parent__ and __name__
>>> as
On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 2:57 AM, Chris McDonough wrote:
> It's a partial step towards getting rid of a dependency that zope.intid has on
> zope.container. I'm thinking that maybe that IContained interface belongs in
> some other package (e.g. maybe zope.contained). That Container base class
> i
On 5/15/09 2:46 AM, Michael Howitz wrote:
> Am 15.05.2009 um 05:32 schrieb Chris McDonough:
>
>> Log message for revision 99961:
>> - Remove a dependency on ``zope.container.contained.Contained``
>> (this is a dumb base class that defines __parent__ and __name__
>> as None and declares that the cla
Am 15.05.2009 um 05:32 schrieb Chris McDonough:
> Log message for revision 99961:
> - Remove a dependency on ``zope.container.contained.Contained``
>(this is a dumb base class that defines __parent__ and __name__
>as None and declares that the class implements IContained).
What's the rea
