On Wed, 6 Jun 2001, Matt Hamilton wrote:
> Out of interest, is this startup time avoided when using BerkeleyDB as
> the storage? I know that it has its own indexes etc. so I am
> wondering if it no longer needs to load an index into memory.
I'm not sure, but as I said in a previous oops-correct
On Wed, 6 Jun 2001, Erik Enge wrote:
> I'm running a 1GB Data.fs with CompressedStorage here and that takes
> probably about 3-5 minutes on a 1GHz with 1GB RAM. I keep banging my head
> against it, but it just won't run faster.
Out of interest, is this startup time avoided when using BerkeleyDB
On Wed, 6 Jun 2001, Erik Enge wrote:
> I'm running a 1GB Data.fs with CompressedStorage here and that takes
> probably about 3-5 minutes on a 1GHz with 1GB RAM. I keep banging my
> head against it, but it just won't run faster.
Oops, misleading you there. Actually, FileStorage uses about 40 se
[no cross-posting, please]
On Wed, 6 Jun 2001, Bjorn Stabell wrote:
> We're planning a Yahoo! Clubs like system that should scale to about
> 30, 000 users. Assuming about 3,000 groups and 20MB per group (group
> functionality includes photo albums), gives a database size of 60GB.
> Assuming on
