On Wed, 6 Jun 2001, Erik Enge wrote:
> I'm running a 1GB Data.fs with CompressedStorage here and that takes
> probably about 3-5 minutes on a 1GHz with 1GB RAM. I keep banging my head
> against it, but it just won't run faster.
Out of interest, is this startup time avoided when using BerkeleyDB as the
storage? I know that it has its own indexes etc. so I am wondering if it
no longer needs to load an index into memory.
Also how are the disks layed out? Is it possible to have, say, 5 disks
each on their own (no RAID) and then split the data.fs over them using
PartitionedFileStorage or similar.
Matt Hamilton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Netsight Internet Solutions, Ltd. Business Vision on the Internet
http://www.netsight.co.uk +44 (0)117 9090901
Web Hosting | Web Design | Domain Names | Co-location | DB Integration
Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
(Related lists -