Re: [Zope-dev] Conform to repository policy.

2010-05-06 Thread Zvezdan Petkovic
On May 6, 2010, at 9:09 AM, Tres Seaver wrote:

 Christian Theune has already mentioned that the inclusion of the author 
 check in his script was a misunderstanding.
 
 If you did not see that message already it's here:
 
 https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-dev/2010-April/040223.html
 
 Can we now please stop changing the author information?
 
 Otherwise, let me just repeat the question I already asked and Christian 
 answered.
 
  Can you point us to the Zope Foundation bylaws
  or a policy document that requires this?
 
  I cannot find this in a contributor agreement.
 
 Best regards,
 
 'Zope Corporation and Contributors' is not a reasonable value for author 
 here, as ZC has transferred all copyrights to the foundation.

Copyright and author are two different things.
ZF has the copyright.  We signed that in the contributor agreement.

Why exactly is Zope Foundation and Contributors a more reasonable value?  
When has Zope Foundation written a piece of code?

 If you as the originial author of zope.minmax wanted to update it to have 
 your own name, and set the maintainer to 'Zope Foundation and Contributors', 
 that would be OK with me, personally.

If I wanted to put my name on it I would have done it in the initial release.  
I was fine with having ZC as author there.

However, what you or I are fine with, personally, absolutely does not matter. 
 What matters is whether something is right or wrong.

 However, until the ZF repository commmittee (Christian, acting for the
 board) updates the zope.repositorypolicy checker and fixer scripts, I'm going 
 to check in changes which comply with the policy as spelled out in those 
 scripts.

So, basically you are saying that we are going to follow an admittedly wrong 
unilateral decision until somebody finds the time to change it?

Why are we so quick to follow that policy and so slow in changing it?

BTW, you still did not answer my question.

Can you point us to the Zope Foundation bylaws
or a policy *document* that requires this?

I cannot find this in a contributor agreement.

I'm sorry, but I just cannot accept a script as a legal document.

Best regards,

Zvezdan

___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )


Re: [Zope-dev] Conform to repository policy.

2010-05-06 Thread Christian Theune

On 05/06/2010 03:44 PM, Zvezdan Petkovic wrote:

On May 6, 2010, at 9:09 AM, Tres Seaver wrote:


Christian Theune has already mentioned that the inclusion of the author check 
in his script was a misunderstanding.

If you did not see that message already it's here:

https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-dev/2010-April/040223.html

Can we now please stop changing the author information?

Otherwise, let me just repeat the question I already asked and Christian 
answered.

Can you point us to the Zope Foundation bylaws
or a policy document that requires this?

I cannot find this in a contributor agreement.

Best regards,


'Zope Corporation and Contributors' is not a reasonable value for author here, 
as ZC has transferred all copyrights to the foundation.


Copyright and author are two different things.
ZF has the copyright.  We signed that in the contributor agreement.

Why exactly is Zope Foundation and Contributors a more reasonable value?  
When has Zope Foundation written a piece of code?


If you as the originial author of zope.minmax wanted to update it to have your 
own name, and set the maintainer to 'Zope Foundation and Contributors', that 
would be OK with me, personally.


If I wanted to put my name on it I would have done it in the initial release.  
I was fine with having ZC as author there.

However, what you or I are fine with, personally, absolutely does not matter. 
 What matters is whether something is right or wrong.


However, until the ZF repository commmittee (Christian, acting for the
board) updates the zope.repositorypolicy checker and fixer scripts, I'm going 
to check in changes which comply with the policy as spelled out in those 
scripts.


So, basically you are saying that we are going to follow an admittedly wrong 
unilateral decision until somebody finds the time to change it?

Why are we so quick to follow that policy and so slow in changing it?

BTW, you still did not answer my question.

Can you point us to the Zope Foundation bylaws
or a policy *document* that requires this?

I cannot find this in a contributor agreement.

I'm sorry, but I just cannot accept a script as a legal document.


You're right. And I was slow and laggy. The change is in. It's been a 
mis-assumption on my side to think author information being equal to 
copyright ownership and I fixed that in the script.


Christian

--
Christian Theune · c...@gocept.com
gocept gmbh  co. kg · forsterstraße 29 · 06112 halle (saale) · germany
http://gocept.com · tel +49 345 1229889 0 · fax +49 345 1229889 1
Zope and Plone consulting and development



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )


Re: [Zope-dev] Conform to repository policy.

2010-05-06 Thread Tres Seaver
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Zvezdan Petkovic wrote:

 Copyright and author are two different things.
 ZF has the copyright.  We signed that in the contributor agreement.
 
 Why exactly is Zope Foundation and Contributors a more reasonable
 value?  When has Zope Foundation written a piece of code?

I don't recall any corporation writing any code either:  developers
write code.  In particular, you (Zvezdan) wrote the original zope.minmax
implementation (or else you were in violation of the contributor
agreement when you checked it in).  As your employer, Zope Corporation
authorizes you as a contributor to do so, but it isn't an author in any
sense that matters outside its historical, no-longer-obtaining role as
the copyright holder.

Since Christian has fixed the script to stop enforcing any particular
value in the author field, feel free to update it:  I would prefer to
have the actual developer's name there, but if you truly feel it should
be Zope Corporation, then that's OK by me.


Tres.
- --
===
Tres Seaver  +1 540-429-0999  tsea...@palladion.com
Palladion Software   Excellence by Designhttp://palladion.com
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEARECAAYFAkvizIYACgkQ+gerLs4ltQ4oqACgmLUFqhGDeQGcmMbkBrsyY0WS
kj0AnRVgjLTCto4/z+LVU7dER/7Rq9kB
=/B+B
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )


Re: [Zope-dev] Conform to repository policy.

2010-05-06 Thread Zvezdan Petkovic
On May 6, 2010, at 9:52 AM, Christian Theune wrote:
 You're right. And I was slow and laggy. The change is in. It's been a 
 mis-assumption on my side to think author information being equal to 
 copyright ownership and I fixed that in the script.

Thank you.

Zvezdan

___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )