On 05/09/2010 15:03, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> On 2010-9-4 00:43, Chris Withers wrote:
>> On 03/09/2010 17:21, Tres Seaver wrote:
I am not sure if this is best done in plone.recipe.zope2instance or
Zope2.Startup.zopectl. They have differing versions of ZopeCmd. Perhaps
the plone.reci
On Thu, Sep 09, 2010 at 02:45:10PM +0200, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> I've opted for a third alternative: use an entry point to define the
> extra commands. If you do this in setup.py:
>
> entry_points="""
>[zopectl.command]
>mycommand = mypackage.commands:func
>"""
>
>
On 9/3/10 18:21 , Tres Seaver wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Wichert Akkerman wrote:
>> I have noticed that now that we are almost exclusively using eggs to
>> distribute our software using "bin/instance run" has become difficult:
>> often the script you want to run is
On 2010-9-5 16:03, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> On 2010-9-4 00:43, Chris Withers wrote:
>> On 03/09/2010 17:21, Tres Seaver wrote:
I am not sure if this is best done in plone.recipe.zope2instance or
Zope2.Startup.zopectl. They have differing versions of ZopeCmd. Perhaps
the plone.recipe
On 2010-9-4 00:43, Chris Withers wrote:
> On 03/09/2010 17:21, Tres Seaver wrote:
>>> I am not sure if this is best done in plone.recipe.zope2instance or
>>> Zope2.Startup.zopectl. They have differing versions of ZopeCmd. Perhaps
>>> the plone.recipe.zope2instance code should be merged into Zope2's
On 03/09/2010 17:21, Tres Seaver wrote:
>> I am not sure if this is best done in plone.recipe.zope2instance or
>> Zope2.Startup.zopectl. They have differing versions of ZopeCmd. Perhaps
>> the plone.recipe.zope2instance code should be merged into Zope2's
>> original as well?
>
> I don't know anythi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> I have noticed that now that we are almost exclusively using eggs to
> distribute our software using "bin/instance run" has become difficult:
> often the script you want to run is located inside an egg which makes to
> path
On Sep 3, 2010, at 12:50 AM, "Wichert Akkerman" wrote:
> I have noticed that now that we are almost exclusively using eggs to
> distribute our software using "bin/instance run" has become difficult:
> often the script you want to run is located inside an egg which makes to
> path to it hard to
On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 10:30 AM, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> On 9/3/10 10:27 , Hanno Schlichting wrote:
>> Given that this code is completely untested except for people actually
>> using it on different platforms I'm not personally going to merge the
>> codebase any further. But anyone else is free
On 9/3/10 10:27 , Hanno Schlichting wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 9:50 AM, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
>> I have noticed that now that we are almost exclusively using eggs to
>> distribute our software using "bin/instance run" has become difficult: often
>> the script you want to run is located insi
On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 9:50 AM, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> I have noticed that now that we are almost exclusively using eggs to
> distribute our software using "bin/instance run" has become difficult: often
> the script you want to run is located inside an egg which makes to path to
> it hard to pr
11 matches
Mail list logo
