Re: [Zope-dev] another validation problem

2000-05-25 Thread Robin Becker
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> , Brian Lloyd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes >Hi guys - > >I _just_ checked in a fix for this. A piece of the namespace >machinery was not updated in the required way to play nice >with the new infrastructure. I've included the reply I made >to the bug report: >

Re: [Zope-dev] another validation problem

2000-05-25 Thread Robin Becker
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Michel Pelletier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes ... > >Does it work if you: > > > ... > > >and call the namespace directly? The two are supposed to be synonymous >but your method is depricated so perhaps it works the other way, if not, >I'd suggest putting this in the

RE: [Zope-dev] another validation problem

2000-05-25 Thread Brian Lloyd
> > The latest CVS version is giving autorization demands (and > failures) with this DTMLmethod. > > This kind of construct used to work fine. > > > > > > > > > > > > 0">non-emptyempty > > > > > > > > Perhaps newly created names in the _ namespace do not get > understood by > the new s

Re: [Zope-dev] another validation problem

2000-05-25 Thread Michel Pelletier
Robin Becker wrote: > > The latest CVS version is giving autorization demands (and failures) with this >DTMLmethod. > This kind of construct used to work fine. > > > > > > 0">non-emptyempty > > > Perhaps newly created names in the _ namespace do not get understood by the new security g