Thomas Lotze wrote:
Martijn Faassen wrote:
Thanks for doing this analysis! It'd be great if you could turn this into
a proposal for future actions...
Do you mean a proposal that would go in the Proposals section of the ztk
docs?
A proposal on the mailing list to start with, but of course
Thomas Lotze wrote:
Martijn Faassen wrote:
* zope.contenttype: we should analyze what is using zope.contenttype.
Of the packages mentioned in ztk.cfg, zope.browserresource, zope.app.file
and zope.app.onlinehelp are. There's also zope.mimetype which seems to be
concerned with the same
Martijn Faassen wrote:
Thanks for doing this analysis! It'd be great if you could turn this into
a proposal for future actions...
Do you mean a proposal that would go in the Proposals section of the ztk
docs?
I'm surprised about the difference in dependencies between zope.file and
On Sep 21, 2009, at 11:42 AM, Martijn Faassen wrote:
* zope.minmax: is this package being used? If not, we could consider
removing it from the ZTK.
It's easy to find that it's used by zope.session.
It is used for conflict resolution.
Regards,
Zvezdan
Zvezdan Petkovic wrote:
On Sep 21, 2009, at 11:42 AM, Martijn Faassen wrote:
* zope.minmax: is this package being used? If not, we could consider
removing it from the ZTK.
It's easy to find that it's used by zope.session.
It is used for conflict resolution.
Thanks for that bit of
Martijn Faassen wrote:
* zope.contenttype: we should analyze what is using zope.contenttype.
Of the packages mentioned in ztk.cfg, zope.browserresource, zope.app.file
and zope.app.onlinehelp are. There's also zope.mimetype which seems to be
concerned with the same subject and is used by
