Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 6 May 2007, at 05:12, Miles wrote:
-1, we can not change semantics of existing interfaces.
I agree with this. Though the restriction is not documented anywhere: I
am happy to add some explanatory notes though.
It do
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Miles wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thanks for the feedback!
>
> (answering a couple of points in this one mail)
>
> Kapil Thangavelu wrote:
>> On Fri, 04 May 2007 14:54:59 -0400, Miles
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> I seem to be generating a sizable prop
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 6 May 2007, at 05:12, Miles wrote:
-1, we can not change semantics of existing interfaces.
I agree with this. Though the restriction is not documented
anywhere: I
am happy to add some explanatory notes though.
It does not need to be docu
Hi,
Thanks for the feedback!
(answering a couple of points in this one mail)
Kapil Thangavelu wrote:
On Fri, 04 May 2007 14:54:59 -0400, Miles
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I seem to be generating a sizable proportion of the traffic on this
list! Apologies in advance for another email...
M
