Stateful workflow was, initially, as much an experiment as anything
else. Now it seems to be a common source of questions. Is anyone actually
working on it? Does it have a champion? If not, then I suggest it
is a trap that we should get rid of. :)
Jim
--
Jim Fulton mailto:[EMAIL
Martijn Faassen wrote:
Jim Fulton wrote:
Stateful workflow was, initially, as much an experiment as anything
else. Now it seems to be a common source of questions. Is anyone
actually
working on it? Does it have a champion? If not, then I suggest it
is a trap that we should get rid of.
Martijn Faassen wrote:
Jim Fulton wrote:
Stateful workflow was, initially, as much an experiment as anything
else. Now it seems to be a common source of questions. Is anyone
actually
working on it? Does it have a champion? If not, then I suggest it
is a trap that we should get rid of.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jim Fulton wrote:
Stateful workflow was, initially, as much an experiment as anything
else. Now it seems to be a common source of questions. Is anyone actually
working on it? Does it have a champion? If not, then I suggest it
is a trap that we
Stephan Richter wrote:
On Wednesday 05 October 2005 06:05, Jim Fulton wrote:
Stateful workflow was, initially, as much an experiment as anything
else. Now it seems to be a common source of questions. Is anyone actually
working on it? Does it have a champion? If not, then I suggest it
is a
On Wednesday 05 October 2005 11:14, Jim Fulton wrote:
Well, it is covered in both books. People have worked on it, if I
remember correctly, to make it work with 3.1. Unfortunately I do not have
time to work on it right now. It is not part of the release, so it is not
that urgent to be
On 10/5/05, Philipp von Weitershausen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Martijn Faassen wrote:
Where is this stateful workflow?
zope.app.workflow. It's never been released, but it's available in the
Zope 3 repository. It hasn't been worked on for over a year now and is
pretty much still the same as
When more than one utility is selected for deleting in the site
management view, only the first selected utility is deleted.
The problem is that the content of regManager is changed inside the
while iteratating over it.
Here is the fix which works for me :
If this is applicable, can please
Hi together
I like to simplify the macro registration.
The target is to get rid of the mapping in a custom class
where we use right now (StandardMacros) and offer a directive
for register macros in ZCML.
See the proposal at:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
jürgen Kartnaller wrote:
When more than one utility is selected for deleting in the site
management view, only the first selected utility is deleted.
The problem is that the content of regManager is changed inside the
while iteratating over it.
Stephan Richter wrote:
On Wednesday 05 October 2005 06:05, Jim Fulton wrote:
Stateful workflow was, initially, as much an experiment as anything
else. Now it seems to be a common source of questions. Is anyone actually
working on it? Does it have a champion? If not, then I suggest it
is a
11 matches
Mail list logo
