Martijn Faassen wrote at 2006-3-2 18:44 +0100:
...
I worry about losing brands we've worked on hard to establish. While
many people do not understand the difference between Zope 2 and Zope 3,
many others have heard about Zope 3 and they know it is not Zope 2.
I do not understand the loss of
Lennart Regebro wrote at 2006-3-2 20:39 +0100:
...
2. Zope3 may also get slightly streamlined, so that Zope3 is what is
needed to run Zope2 but not more. That means that Zope3 would lose the
ZMI.
I would consider this a severe loss.
The ZMI provides menu guided operations.
This is much easier
On 3/3/06, Dieter Maurer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
MS renames its core technologies every few years (at least)
Eh... no they don't. It's been called MS Windows, and MS Office
and the like for like 15-20 years now. :-) In fact I can't think of
any case where Microsoft have renamed any
Hi there,
I've been thinking a lot about the various things said in the vision
discussion. Lots of people said things I agree with, but other things
were said that make me worry a lot (losing brand-identity and useful
names), and so on. Here I sketch out some of my thoughts.
Reading back
I'm so confused by all the names and stuff that I find it hard to
answer to what somebody is saying, so I will just state *my* vision of
the future.
Technology-wise:
1. Zope2 uses more and more of Zope3s technologies. Anything that can
be merged gets merged. That means security, pagetemplates
On Thursday 02 March 2006 14:39, Lennart Regebro wrote:
4. We develop TTW development tools for Zope3. I think me and Jim both
agree we should have these. I think me and Jim has a completely
different vision of what they should be. :)
Note that WebDev is *a* RD project aimed at discovering the
