Gustavo Niemeyer wrote:
Hello everyone,
I was just implementing a ZCML statement for a view-related
component which should also take in consideration request
interfaces for adaptation.
After reading the SimplifySkinning proposal form Philipp, I'm
somewhat unsure about how to define the request
On Thursday 14 September 2006 06:32, Florent Xicluna wrote:
Philipp von Weitershausen philipp at weitershausen.de writes:
We should remove it from the trunk.
OK
+1
For backward compatibility, I suggest we redefine
zope.app.introspector.Introspect to zope.app.apidoc.UseAPIDoc via
Christian Theune wrote:
Gah.
Mea culpa.
Until recently I didn't know that the zope.conf.in could even be copied
over to zope.conf, because every checkout that I ever used always picked
up the zope.conf and nothing ever told me to copy it. (Although I was
slightly annoyed having to edit
On Saturday 16 September 2006 05:10, Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
*If* someone else had that problem too, I'd propose to change away from
the fallback of using zope.conf.in (we force people to create the
principals too, don't we?)
Right. I wouldn't mind that. +0 from me.
It is all
Stephan Richter wrote:
On Saturday 16 September 2006 05:10, Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
*If* someone else had that problem too, I'd propose to change away from
the fallback of using zope.conf.in (we force people to create the
principals too, don't we?)
Right. I wouldn't mind that. +0 from
Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
Stephan Richter wrote:
On Saturday 16 September 2006 05:10, Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
*If* someone else had that problem too, I'd propose to change away from
the fallback of using zope.conf.in (we force people to create the
principals too, don't we?)
On Wednesday 13 September 2006 13:28, Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
Contributing to a community also means adapting to its processes and way
of working. The process has been working well for Zope 2 developers, so
I don't see why it can't work for Zope 3.
A couple of comments:
First, if
Stephan Richter wrote:
On Wednesday 13 September 2006 13:28, Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
Contributing to a community also means adapting to its processes and way
of working. The process has been working well for Zope 2 developers, so
I don't see why it can't work for Zope 3.
A couple of
--On 13. September 2006 20:12:50 +0200 Dieter Maurer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Philipp von Weitershausen wrote at 2006-9-13 11:05 +0200:
Over the last couple of days we've been discussing Zope's new release
cycle and the release management. I would like to sum up what seems to
be the gist
