Christian Theune wrote:
Am Sonntag, den 22.04.2007, 15:11 -0400 schrieb Benji York:
David Pratt wrote:
Any idea what is happening with the site?
Getting distribution for zope.app.zptpage Error: Can't download
http://download.zope.org/distribution/zope.app.zptpage-3.4.0a1.tar.gz:
403
Am Montag, den 23.04.2007, 12:07 +0530 schrieb Baiju M:
Baiju M wrote:
Christian Theune wrote:
Am Sonntag, den 22.04.2007, 15:11 -0400 schrieb Benji York:
David Pratt wrote:
Any idea what is happening with the site?
Getting distribution for zope.app.zptpage Error: Can't
Max M wrote:
Martin Aspeli skrev:
If you're talking about ArchGenXML, which generates AT code from UML,
it's
not too bad. The code it generates is pretty clean, and if you decide to
abandon code generation, there's a minimum of cruft (mostly a few comment
blocks) that you can remove if you
Hi. I'm working on a project and I'm using ZODB but my mentor advices me
that this model of database will be so big after one or two years. He
consider that because ZODB works with transactions and it's added to
ZODB frequently. My mentor mentioned me PostgreSQL, but I don't want it,
because is
--On 23. April 2007 09:20:14 -0400 Ariel Eduardo Morales Malpica
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi. I'm working on a project and I'm using ZODB but my mentor advices me
that this model of database will be so big after one or two years. He
consider that because ZODB works with transactions and
I've reopened 98111 because it doesn't deal with the situation where the
collection is empty, i.e. when the user didn't select any of the options in
the collection widgets.
Can I check the newly attached patch to the bug into 3.2, 3.3 and trunk?
Are you aware of any code that would break
Giovannetti, Mark wrote:
I like that update. However, it would fail authentication on
stored lengths less than 40. Yes, I know that a length less than
40 would mean an anomalous stored password, but at least we
guarantee a blank '' salt, rather than the possibility of getting
some of the last
On Apr 23, 2007, at 12:03 PM, Giovannetti, Mark wrote:
You make a point, although I would expect a reference
implementation to be as good as possible. Hence, improvements
can be encouraged and, perhaps, the security bar raised.
Adding this salt patch allows a better, more secure reference
Am Montag, den 23.04.2007, 00:03 -0700 schrieb Leonardo Rochael:
I've reopened 98111 because it doesn't deal with the situation where the
collection is empty, i.e. when the user didn't select any of the options in
the collection widgets.
Can I check the newly attached patch to the bug into
Am Montag, den 23.04.2007, 20:03 +0200 schrieb Martijn Faassen:
Christian Theune wrote:
The eggs are released now.
Cool, thanks! I'll try this out.
Note that I see -3.4.tar.gz released 11 april, as well as 3.4.0a1
tarballs released yesterday. What are those 3.4 release eggs doing
Jim Fulton wrote:
On Apr 23, 2007, at 2:43 PM, Martijn Faassen wrote:
...
It'd be a lot easier. You'd still have to list it for all eggs that
you depend on directly. It would be nice if this could be automated as
well, as being in two places to add a single dependency is more work
than being
11 matches
Mail list logo
