On 5/25/06, Philipp von Weitershausen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I think they do pretty much the same thing (but I could be mistaken).
Are they interchangeable? If not, are they compatible so that we just
add both ways to both files? If they're not compatible, which one should
we use in the futur
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The Buildbot has detected a failed build of Zope3 branches Zope-3.1 2.4 Windows
2000 zc-bbwin4.
Jim, this failure seems to be related to your recent ZEO work. Here's a
link to the log:
http://buildbot.zope.org/Zope3%20branches%20Zope-3.1%202.4%20Windows%202000%20zc-
The Buildbot has detected a failed build of Zope3 branches Zope-3.1 2.4 Windows
2000 zc-bbwin4.
Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.zope.org/
Build Reason: The web-page 'force build' button was pressed by 'Benji':
Build Source Stamp: None
Blamelist:
BUILD FAILED: failed test
sincerely,
-The Buil
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Steve Alexander wrote:
> Tres wrote:
>> In Zope2 land, the module is still available, and can be used by other
>> code (which may not know of that issue). I'm *not* in favor of shipping
>> an un-patched docutils until we work this out. For instance,
Tres wrote:
>
> In Zope2 land, the module is still available, and can be used by other
> code (which may not know of that issue). I'm *not* in favor of shipping
> an un-patched docutils until we work this out. For instance, perhaps we
> should be patching docutils to make the *default* settings d
The Buildbot has detected a failed build of Zope3 branches Zope-3.1 2.4 Windows
2000 zc-bbwin4.
Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.zope.org/
Build Reason: changes
Build Source Stamp: 6539
Blamelist: jim
BUILD FAILED: failed test
sincerely,
-The Buildbot
___
The Buildbot has detected a failed build of Zope3 branches Zope-3.1 2.4 Linux
remy.
Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.zope.org/
Build Reason: changes
Build Source Stamp: 6538
Blamelist:
Zen,alecm,andreasjung,baijum,benji,benji_york,chrisw,ctheune,dominikhuber,efge,fdrake,flox,hdima,jens,jim,jukart,
The Buildbot has detected a failed build of Zope3 branches 3.2 2.4 Linux remy.
Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.zope.org/
Build Reason: changes
Build Source Stamp: 6537
Blamelist: chrisw,efge,fdrake,hdima,jim,oestermeier,philikon,srichter,tseaver
BUILD FAILED: failed test
sincerely,
-The Buildbot
The Buildbot has detected a failed build of Zope3 branches 3.3 2.4 Linux remy.
Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.zope.org/
Build Reason: changes
Build Source Stamp: 6536
Blamelist: jim,philikon
BUILD FAILED: failed test
sincerely,
-The Buildbot
___
Zope
The Buildbot has detected a failed build of Zope3 branches Zope-3.1 2.4 Windows
2000 zc-bbwin4.
Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.zope.org/
Build Reason: changes
Build Source Stamp: 6538
Blamelist:
Zen,alecm,andreasjung,baijum,benji,benji_york,chrisw,ctheune,dominikhuber,efge,fdrake,flox,hdima,jens
The Buildbot has detected a failed build of Zope3 trunk 2.4 FreeBSD tmiddleton.
Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.zope.org/
Build Reason: changes
Build Source Stamp: 6532
Blamelist: jim,philikon,tseaver
BUILD FAILED: failed test
sincerely,
-The Buildbot
___
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Michael Haubenwallner wrote:
> Tres Seaver wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> Michael Haubenwallner wrote:
>>> Tres Seaver wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jim Fulton wrote:
>>>
Recently, a serious security flaw was found in Zope 2 due to it's
improper support for allowing reStructuredText to be edited through-
the-web. reStructuredText has directives that allow inclusion of any
file a Zope process could read and inclusion of data obtained from
fetching arbitrary U
On Thu, Jul 06, 2006 at 07:58:24PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Philipp von Weitershausen wrote at 2006-7-6 18:29 +0200:
> > ... fixing a trivial error without a unit test ...
...
> If the test is as trivial as the fix, then one can easily add it
> (if one is not confident that the bug is true
On Fri, Jul 07, 2006 at 08:48:39PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> In many cases, I can convince myself that a fix does actually work without
> performing a test -- at least in the sense that it removes one bug.
In many cases I have made completely trivial bug fixes that I was
absolutely confide
Tres Seaver wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Michael Haubenwallner wrote:
Tres Seaver wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jim Fulton wrote:
Zope 3, as releases is not affected by the security hole that
has plagued Zope 2, however, Michael Haubenwallner h
16 matches
Mail list logo