Jim Fulton wrote:
>
>
> I think we need to have a much more basic discussion.
>
> IMO deprecation was a reasonable thing to try that hasn't really
> worked out well. People find deperecation warnings to be very
> annoying and I don't think it's going to be practical to make
> backward-
I think we need to have a much more basic discussion.
IMO deprecation was a reasonable thing to try that hasn't really
worked out well. People find deperecation warnings to be very
annoying and I don't think it's going to be practical to make
backward-concompatable changes when eggs are u
Dieter Maurer wrote:
> Jim Washington wrote at 2007-3-27 16:28 -0400:
>
>> ...
>> Yes, I think so, at least in the implementation/algorithm I am using.
>> There may be other implementations that do not need this. Note,
>> however, that the canonical list does not have to be complex objects.
>
On Mar 29, 2007, at 11:26 PM, Baiju M wrote:
Jim Fulton wrote:
Log message for revision 73922:
This file is a recipe for bad releases
Changed:
D zope.testing/trunk/setup.cfg
I am asking for a resolution here, do we want this file in svn for
other packages ?
No, IMO, and since I am the
