[Zope3-dev] Re: faulty releases and pypi access [update]
Stephan Richter wrote: [..] A fairly simple tool can find and report all the problems found and offer assistance. I think it is worth investing in one, especially since it will reduce my overhead since my manual checking now becomes automated. FWIW: If this tool were available right now so that people could start using it today that would be great. But I don't see it yet :-( But we do have a problem right now. And what Philipp suggests doesn't require anything to be done other than people starting to adopt the approach he is pushing. I don't see this in conflict. Rather as complementing each other. Raphael Regards, Stephan ___ Zope3-dev mailing list Zope3-dev@zope.org Unsub: http://mail.zope.org/mailman/options/zope3-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
[Zope3-dev] Re: z3c.form 1.0.0 released!
Stephan Richter schrieb: Hello everyone, Hi Stephan, first congratulations to Roger and you! [..] jquery.* The ``jquery`` namespace packages provide a first attempt to have AJAX-enabled forms. It is already possible to validate widget values and do some other form-unrelated UI goodies. Just a quick question in passing, as I understand this as Zope growing "yet another(?)" AJAX framework. Did you consciously decide against KSS (http://kssproject.org) or do you see this as complementary? Raphael ___ Zope3-dev mailing list Zope3-dev@zope.org Unsub: http://mail.zope.org/mailman/options/zope3-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
[Zope3-dev] Re: [Zope-dev] Re: Google Summer of Code
Paul Carduner schrieb: I have added a proposal for AJAX/json support in Zope3. It is *very* incomplete as I don't know the complete details of what AJAX support constitutes beyond having different widgets. If you have any thoughts on the matter, please add to my proposal. - Paul You know that KSS (at least kss.core) is meant to work on Zope 3? http://kukit.org Raphael ___ Zope3-dev mailing list Zope3-dev@zope.org Unsub: http://mail.zope.org/mailman/options/zope3-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
[Zope3-dev] Re: Community opinion about workflow engine
Godefroid Chapelle schrieb: [..] In order to help us make a proposal, we would be very interested to hear your comments both - about the existing workflows (DCWorkflow, Zope3.wfmc, AlphaFlow, OpenFlow...) - or about the directions that you would suggest in order to help you use a given engine (missing features, simplification,...) and join the effort to improve one of the existing engines. Depends a bit on what you need in the end: Plone integration? activity based wf? "stand-alone" Zope 3 application (meaning: it should run in a plain Zope 3 environment, no Zope 2/Five/CMF/Plone ...) If you can get away with a simple state-based wf and you need Plone support DCWorkflow should be just fine. If you need to support activity-based workflows and Plone integration I'd start looking into AlphaFlow first and help Christian and the gocept guys to get it ready for Plone 3. ;-) If you need it to be independent of CMF/Plone ... then zope3.wfmc might be a starting point but without having looked at it recently I do think it's quite old and may not be up to the current best practices, so there might be some effort involved. Others please correct me if I'm wrong! Raphael Thanks ___ Zope3-dev mailing list Zope3-dev@zope.org Unsub: http://mail.zope.org/mailman/options/zope3-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
[Zope3-dev] Re: Zope 2.9 and Zope 3 i18n, more questions...
Chris Withers wrote: Philipp von Weitershausen wrote: [..] Hanno Schlichting will be working in similar areas, I've heard. Perhaps you want to make friends with him :). Where can I find him? Usually in Hamburg, Germany ;-) or head over to plone.devel Raphael cheers, Chris ___ Zope3-dev mailing list Zope3-dev@zope.org Unsub: http://mail.zope.org/mailman/options/zope3-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
