Stateful workflow was, initially, as much an experiment as anything
else. Now it seems to be a common source of questions. Is anyone actually
working on it? Does it have a champion? If not, then I suggest it
is a trap that we should get rid of. :)
Jim
--
Jim Fulton mailto:[EMAIL
Martijn Faassen wrote:
Jim Fulton wrote:
Stateful workflow was, initially, as much an experiment as anything
else. Now it seems to be a common source of questions. Is anyone
actually
working on it? Does it have a champion? If not, then I suggest it
is a trap that we should get rid of.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jim Fulton wrote:
Stateful workflow was, initially, as much an experiment as anything
else. Now it seems to be a common source of questions. Is anyone actually
working on it? Does it have a champion? If not, then I suggest it
is a trap that we
Stephan Richter wrote:
On Wednesday 05 October 2005 06:05, Jim Fulton wrote:
Stateful workflow was, initially, as much an experiment as anything
else. Now it seems to be a common source of questions. Is anyone actually
working on it? Does it have a champion? If not, then I suggest it
is a
On Wednesday 05 October 2005 11:14, Jim Fulton wrote:
Well, it is covered in both books. People have worked on it, if I
remember correctly, to make it work with 3.1. Unfortunately I do not have
time to work on it right now. It is not part of the release, so it is not
that urgent to be
