Stephan Richter wrote:
IMO multi-typed interfaces would make sense. Would you have any
objections if I change the code the following way:
module: zope.app.component.interface.py, line 78
75if iface_type is not None:
76if not iface_type.extends(IInterface):
77raise TypeError(
Dominik Huber wrote:
Hi Stephan,
Is there a specific reason why only one interface type is directly
provided per interface?
If two types are registered for one interface the first type is chucked
out of the interface during the registration of the second,
but the first stays still registered with
On Monday 25 April 2005 07:26, Dominik Huber wrote:
> Is there a specific reason why only one interface type is directly
> provided per interface?
> If two types are registered for one interface the first type is chucked
> out of the interface during the registration of the second,
Right.
> but t
Hi Stephan,
Is there a specific reason why only one interface type is directly
provided per interface?
If two types are registered for one interface the first type is chucked
out of the interface during the registration of the second,
but the first stays still registered within the utitlity servi
