--On 18. Januar 2006 07:36:35 -0500 Jim Fulton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In the future, if someone introduces a major change, they *must* be
committed to be available to deal with issues that arise during the
release cycle. Perhaps we need to pick different release dates to
avoid holidays.
Andreas Jung wrote:
...
The basic problem with the windows release is that there is currently
nobody in charge for the windows release (although Tim is again doing
working on the Windows side, ALL HAIL TIM).
I'll repeat or emphasis that the windows release process needs to
be simple enough
--On 18. Januar 2006 10:31:03 -0500 Jim Fulton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andreas Jung wrote:
...
The basic problem with the windows release is that there is currently
nobody in charge for the windows release (although Tim is again doing
working on the Windows side, ALL HAIL TIM).
I'll
On Wed, Jan 18, 2006 at 04:37:12PM +0100, Andreas Jung wrote:
| I'll repeat or emphasis that the windows release process needs to
| be simple enough that *I* can do it.
|
| Well, that's a perfect goal :-) But my experience with doing slightly
| simple programming tasks on Windows is that Windows
Jim Fulton wrote:
Andreas Jung wrote:
...
I think 2.9.0 is the _real_ 2.9 beta which will be widely used by ppl :-)
I could be wrong, but if we stick to a 6-month release cycle for feature
releases, I don't think there is going to be much appetite for bug-fix
releases, except in extreme
