Andreas Jung wrote:
I for one, is NOT interested in backporting fixed in Five trunk to
both Five 1.0, 1.1, 1.3, 1.4 and 1.5, which is what are the current
versions of Five if we say that Zope 2.8 and 2.7 should be still
supported after the release of 2.10.
We don't talk about Zope 2.7 which i
Benji York wrote:
Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
Uh, never mind.
+1 :)
Any chance you could explain why you feel that way?
Chris
--
Simplistix - Content Management, Zope & Python Consulting
- http://www.simplistix.co.uk
___
Zope3-d
Chris Withers wrote:
> Benji York wrote:
>> Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
>>> Uh, never mind.
>>
>> +1 :)
>
> Any chance you could explain why you feel that way?
Follow this thread:
http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope3-dev/2005-November/016561.html
Philipp
__
Jim Washington wrote:
> Still playing with Dojo. Very Nice! :)
>
> I'm having a problem with content-type for items served from a
> resourceDirectory.
>
> In particular, one piece of dojo, a file with a .html extension begins
> with . The DOCTYPE says XHTML 1.0
> Strict, but Zope3 returns it as te
Jim Washington wrote:
wsgi+zope=very cool!
Definitely.
--
Benji York
Senior Software Engineer
Zope Corporation
___
Zope3-dev mailing list
Zope3-dev@zope.org
Unsub: http://mail.zope.org/mailman/options/zope3-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
I wrote:
> A small but important caveat: Paste.urlmap (0.9) does not seem to like
> :port in urls at the moment, so no http://localhost:8180 for now. Zope3
> can be listening at 8180, but you need a non-port alias for everything
> to work properly. Of course, it is possible I have a local
> misco
